search for: 1160,19

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "1160,19".

Did you mean: 1120,19
2020 Nov 19
3
[PATCH 0/2] [clang-format] Add new configurations
From: Anastasiia Lukianenko <anastasiia_lukianenko at epam.com> We are trying to use the clang-format approach as a base for Xen [1] style formatting. During the state of testing clang-format with different configurations, we found that some points regarding the Xen coding style are not configurable. Therefore, we decided to add them to be able to make a choice in different cases. Regards,
2019 Sep 27
0
[RFC PATCH 10/13] vsock: add multi-transports support
..._SHUTDOWN)) { bool data_ready_now = false; int ret = transport->notify_poll_in( @@ -1132,7 +1184,6 @@ static int vsock_stream_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, err = 0; sk = sock->sk; vsk = vsock_sk(sk); - transport = vsk->transport; lock_sock(sk); @@ -1160,19 +1211,26 @@ static int vsock_stream_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, goto out; } + /* Set the remote address that we are connecting to. */ + memcpy(&vsk->remote_addr, remote_addr, + sizeof(vsk->remote_addr)); + + err = vsock_assign_transport(vsk,...
2019 Sep 27
29
[RFC PATCH 00/13] vsock: add multi-transports support
Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using
2019 Sep 27
29
[RFC PATCH 00/13] vsock: add multi-transports support
Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using