Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "116,21".
Did you mean:
116,23
2007 Apr 18
7
[patch 0/6] Various cleanups
Hi Andi,
Here's a little batch of cleanups:
- re-enable VDSO when PARAVIRT is enabled
- make the parainstructions symbols match the
other altinstructions naming convention
- add kernel command-line options to disable altinstructions for
smp and pv_ops
Oh, and I'm mailing your noreplacement patch back at you, for no
particularly good reason.
J
--
2007 Apr 18
7
[patch 0/6] Various cleanups
Hi Andi,
Here's a little batch of cleanups:
- re-enable VDSO when PARAVIRT is enabled
- make the parainstructions symbols match the
other altinstructions naming convention
- add kernel command-line options to disable altinstructions for
smp and pv_ops
Oh, and I'm mailing your noreplacement patch back at you, for no
particularly good reason.
J
--
2003 Mar 30
1
[RFC][patch] dynamic rolling block and sum sizes II
...etmp, struct file_struct *file);
+void read_sum_head(int f, struct sum_struct *sum);
void send_files(struct file_list *flist,int f_out,int f_in);
int try_bind_local(int s,
int ai_family, int ai_socktype,
--- generator.c Sat Mar 29 11:11:30 2003
+++ generator.c Sat Mar 29 12:16:02 2003
@@ -116,13 +116,21 @@
/*
- send a header that says "we have no checksums" down the f_out fd
+ * NULL sum_struct means we have no checksums
*/
-static void send_null_sums(int f_out)
+
+void write_sum_head(int f, struct sum_struct *sum)
{
- write_int(f_out, 0);
- write_int(f_out, block_s...
2011 Mar 11
2
[PATCH 1/2] Allow reading more data than the reported size of a volume
If a volume is not an exact multiple of 512 bytes, qemu-img will report its size
rounded down to a 512 byte boundary. However, when copying, the file is still
read until EOF, which will return more data than was expected. This change
prevents that causing a failure in itself.
The situation is still not resolved, however, as there are still situations
where this will cause a failure. For example,
2017 Jul 21
10
[PATCH v10 00/10] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v9 was here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00139.html
This depends on these three series (the first two being single minor
patches):
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00215.html
There is no substantive change. I
2017 Jul 17
12
[PATCH v9 00/11] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
This depends on the patch series
"[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml."
(https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html)
v8 was posted here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html
v9:
- I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of
smaller, incremental patches.
There are some other changes vs v8, but
2017 Aug 09
16
[PATCH v12 00/11] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
This fixes almost everything. Note that it adds an extra commit which
fixes the whole utf8/iconv business.
It's probably better to list what isn't fixed:
(1) I didn't leave the osinfo code around because I'm still haven't
looked too closely at virt-builder-repository. Can't we just fetch
this code from the git history when we need it?
(2) I didn't change the way
2017 Jul 31
16
[PATCH v11 00/10] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00245.html
No actual change here, but I rebased and retested. Also this series
now does not depend on any other patch series since everything else
needed is upstream.
Rich.
2017 Jun 19
29
[PATCH v7 00/29] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v6 was posted here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html
and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html
Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm
intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new
virt-inspector to see if I can find any
2017 Jun 21
45
[PATCH v8 00/42] Refactor utilities and reimplement inspection.
v7 was:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html
I believe this addresses all comments received so far.
Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images
processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is
identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid