search for: 115666

...nting with. It might be good to experiment with River’s work and the existing outlining pass to see if this functionality can effectively fall out of what we have already. Here’s the recent IR-level outlining thread for reference wrt River’s work: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115666.html - Jessica On Aug 15, 2017, at 11:22 AM, Graham Yiu via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: Hello, My team and I are looking to do some enhancements in the partial inliner in opt. Would appreciate any feedback that folks might have. # P...

.../watch?v=yorld-WSOeU>) [2] Original RFC (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-August/104170.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-August/104170.html>) [3] [RFC] Add IR level interprocedural outliner for code size. (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115666.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115666.html>) [4] [RFC] PT.2 Add IR level interprocedural outliner for code size. (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-September/117153.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-September/117153.html>) -------...

What about Webmin Module compatbility ? If I do not create any rule violating any of that new features, it will work ? Or the module is unusable until someone make necessary modifications ? F?bio Rabelo

...riment with River’s work and the existing outlining pass to see >> if this functionality can effectively fall out of what we have already. >> >> Here’s the recent IR-level outlining thread for reference wrt River’s >> work: *http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115666.html* >> <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115666.html> >> >> - Jessica >> >> On Aug 15, 2017, at 11:22 AM, Graham Yiu via llvm-dev < >> *llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org* <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >&g...

...gt; Gerolf > > >> On Sep 5, 2017, at 4:16 PM, River Riddle via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> Hey Everybody, >> A little while ago I posted an RFC(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115666.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115666.html>) with the proposition of adding a new outliner at the IR level. There was some confusion and many questions regarding the proposal which I’d like to address here: >> >> Note about nomenclature: >> Ca...

...marks/questions are below also. > > Thanks > Gerolf > > > On Sep 5, 2017, at 4:16 PM, River Riddle via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hey Everybody, > A little while ago I posted an RFC(http://lists.llvm.org/pipe > rmail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115666.html) with the proposition of adding a > new outliner at the IR level. There was some confusion and many questions > regarding the proposal which I’d like to address here: > > Note about nomenclature: > Candidate: A repeated sequence of instructions within a module. > Occurr...

...asonable approach. A few more remarks/questions are below also. Thanks Gerolf > On Sep 5, 2017, at 4:16 PM, River Riddle via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hey Everybody, > A little while ago I posted an RFC(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115666.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115666.html>) with the proposition of adding a new outliner at the IR level. There was some confusion and many questions regarding the proposal which I’d like to address here: > > Note about nomenclature: > Candidate: A r...

Hey Everybody, A little while ago I posted an RFC( http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115666.html) with the proposition of adding a new outliner at the IR level. There was some confusion and many questions regarding the proposal which I’d like to address here: Note about nomenclature: Candidate: A repeated sequence of instructions within a module. Occurrence: One instance of a can...

...;> >>> On Sep 5, 2017, at 4:16 PM, River Riddle via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >>> >>> Hey Everybody, >>> A little while ago I posted an RFC(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115666.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115666.html>) with the proposition of adding a new outliner at the IR level. There was some confusion and many questions regarding the proposal which I’d like to address here: >>> >>> Note about nomenclature: >&gt...

Hello, My team and I are looking to do some enhancements in the partial inliner in opt. Would appreciate any feedback that folks might have. # Partial Inlining in LLVM opt ## Summary ### Background Currently, the partial inliner searches the first few blocks of the callee and looks for a branch to the return block (ie. early return). If found, it attempts to outline the rest of the