search for: 11451

...ation(Data) SIP/teleglobe-09f887 (None) Down (None) 1 active channel 12 active calls Jan 30 03:28:13 WARNING[2671]: channel.c:781 channel_find_locked: Avoided deadlock for '0x9f6a6f0', 10 retries! Jan 30 03:28:14 ERROR[26983]: chan_sip.c:11451 sipsock_read: We could NOT get the channel lock for SIP/teleglobe-09f83250 - Call ID 73590b3f10718d3413ea09ce3af750a8 at xx.yy.152.25! Jan 30 03:28:14 ERROR[26983]: chan_sip.c:11452 sipsock_read: SIP MESSAGE JUST IGNORED: BYE Jan 30 03:28:14 ERROR[26983]: chan_sip.c:11453 sipsock_read: BAD! BAD!...

This is in regards to: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11451 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13008 Would it be possible to find out the current state of AES-GCM mode for file shares? Outside of Samba, CCM is typically slower and considered inferior to GCM I apologize for formatting issues, I typically don’t use email lists. In /source3/smbd...

...associations" there is possibility for creating clusters of association rules. I do not understand, how I have to interpret clusters of rules. Let us have next association rules and clusters (see table). My final goal is to have clusters of items. Does it mean that items 11180, 10378, 52848, 11451, ..., 50417 are all in cluster "1" ? What is the point of clustering of association rules, how do I have to use them for clustering of items which are present in rules? rules support confidence lift clusters {11180} => {10378} 0.000529646 1 1708.238095 1 {10378} => {11180...

...re's also a new optinal encryption algorithm aes-gcm-128, but for now this is only selected as fallback and aes-ccm-128 is preferred because of the better performance. This might change in future versions when hardware encryption will be supported. See https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11451. New smbclient subcommands ------------------------- - Query a directory for change notifications: notify <dir name> - Server side copy: scopy <source filename> <destination filename> New rpcclient subcommands ------------------------- netshareenumall - Enumerate all sh...

...re's also a new optinal encryption algorithm aes-gcm-128, but for now this is only selected as fallback and aes-ccm-128 is preferred because of the better performance. This might change in future versions when hardware encryption will be supported. See https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11451. New smbclient subcommands ------------------------- - Query a directory for change notifications: notify <dir name> - Server side copy: scopy <source filename> <destination filename> New rpcclient subcommands ------------------------- netshareenumall - Enumerate all sh...

...re's also a new optinal encryption algorithm aes-gcm-128, but for now this is only selected as fallback and aes-ccm-128 is preferred because of the better performance. This might change in future versions when hardware encryption will be supported. See https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11451. New smbclient subcommands ------------------------- - Query a directory for change notifications: notify <dir name> - Server side copy: scopy <source filename> <destination filename> New rpcclient subcommands ------------------------- netshareenumall - Enumerate all sh...

...re's also a new optinal encryption algorithm aes-gcm-128, but for now this is only selected as fallback and aes-ccm-128 is preferred because of the better performance. This might change in future versions when hardware encryption will be supported. See https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11451. New smbclient subcommands ------------------------- - Query a directory for change notifications: notify <dir name> - Server side copy: scopy <source filename> <destination filename> New rpcclient subcommands ------------------------- netshareenumall - Enumerate all sh...

...optinal encryption algorithm aes-gcm-128, > but for now this is only selected as fallback and aes-ccm-128 > is preferred because of the better performance. This might change > in future versions when hardware encryption will be supported. > See https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11451. > > New smbclient subcommands > ------------------------- > > - Query a directory for change notifications: notify <dir name> > - Server side copy: scopy <source filename> <destination filename> > > New rpcclient subcommands > ----------------------...

In the Agile Web Devopment with Rails book, it says (p 427) that omitting the :returns option from a web service api, the method will "return nothing to the caller". However, I have written a test and invoked it from the browser. It says "return value nil" but XML response: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> <env:Envelope

Dear R-help, Hi I've got data table with variation and freqeuncy. I don't know how to get mean and sd. Please help me. Cheers. ========== variation frequency 0.503 79930 0.174 291140 -0.444 95916 -0.731 11451 0.453 102899 0.596 46133 -0.295 204859 0.013 390121 0.311 187552 -0.085 378902 -0.633 28164 0.175 291411 0.611 41903 0.318 183254 -0.661 22580 0.149 312574 0.594 46903 -0.557 47839 -0.451 92145 0.225 252013 0.870 3731 -0.552 50048 -0.786 4997 -0.445 95784 -0.501 68721 -0.284 214963 =========...

...re's also a new optinal encryption algorithm aes-gcm-128, but for now this is only selected as fallback and aes-ccm-128 is preferred because of the better performance. This might change in future versions when hardware encryption will be supported. See https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11451. New smbclient subcommands ------------------------- - Query a directory for change notifications: notify <dir name> - Server side copy: scopy <source filename> <destination filename> New rpcclient subcommands ------------------------- netshareenumall - Enumerate all sh...

...re's also a new optinal encryption algorithm aes-gcm-128, but for now this is only selected as fallback and aes-ccm-128 is preferred because of the better performance. This might change in future versions when hardware encryption will be supported. See https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11451. New smbclient subcommands ------------------------- - Query a directory for change notifications: notify <dir name> - Server side copy: scopy <source filename> <destination filename> New rpcclient subcommands ------------------------- netshareenumall - Enumerate all sh...

...re's also a new optinal encryption algorithm aes-gcm-128, but for now this is only selected as fallback and aes-ccm-128 is preferred because of the better performance. This might change in future versions when hardware encryption will be supported. See https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11451. New smbclient subcommands ------------------------- - Query a directory for change notifications: notify <dir name> - Server side copy: scopy <source filename> <destination filename> New rpcclient subcommands ------------------------- netshareenumall - Enumerate all sh...

...re's also a new optinal encryption algorithm aes-gcm-128, but for now this is only selected as fallback and aes-ccm-128 is preferred because of the better performance. This might change in future versions when hardware encryption will be supported. See https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11451. New smbclient subcommands ------------------------- - Query a directory for change notifications: notify <dir name> - Server side copy: scopy <source filename> <destination filename> New rpcclient subcommands ------------------------- netshareenumall - Enumerate all sh...

...re's also a new optinal encryption algorithm aes-gcm-128, but for now this is only selected as fallback and aes-ccm-128 is preferred because of the better performance. This might change in future versions when hardware encryption will be supported. See https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11451. New smbclient subcommands ------------------------- - Query a directory for change notifications: notify <dir name> - Server side copy: scopy <source filename> <destination filename> New rpcclient subcommands ------------------------- netshareenumall - Enumerate all sh...

...re's also a new optinal encryption algorithm aes-gcm-128, but for now this is only selected as fallback and aes-ccm-128 is preferred because of the better performance. This might change in future versions when hardware encryption will be supported. See https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11451. New smbclient subcommands ------------------------- - Query a directory for change notifications: notify <dir name> - Server side copy: scopy <source filename> <destination filename> New rpcclient subcommands ------------------------- netshareenumall - Enumerate all sh...

...t.cc >&5 configure:10765: $? = 0 configure:10785: result: yes configure:10811: checking whether the g++ linker (/usr/ccs/bin/ld) supports shared libraries configure:10836: result: yes configure:10907: checking dynamic linker characteristics configure:11447: result: solaris2.8 ld.so configure:11451: checking how to hardcode library paths into programs configure:11476: result: immediate configure:11490: checking whether stripping libraries is possible configure:11495: result: yes configure:12802: checking if libtool supports shared libraries configure:12804: result: yes configure:12807: checki...

What's the config.log from this run? -bw On 11/3/05, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > > Following the instructions here: > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/TestingGuide.html#run > > I get an error running configure in the llvm-test directory. > > ./configure > --with-llvmgccdir=/localhome/tbrethou/cfrontend/sparc/llvm-gcc/ >

Following the instructions here: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/TestingGuide.html#run I get an error running configure in the llvm-test directory. ./configure --with-llvmgccdir=/localhome/tbrethou/cfrontend/sparc/llvm-gcc/ --with-f2c=/home/vadve/shared/localtools/sparc --with-llvmsrc=/localhome/tbrethou/llvm --with-llvmobj=/localhome/tbrethou/llvm Error: [cut lots of config output] checking

...-0.025 4 10674 1919 1919 0.3375 2.4625 -0.025 4 10428 1920 1920 0.3375 2.4875 -0.025 4 10181 1921 1921 0.3375 2.5125 -0.025 4 10037 1922 1922 0.3375 2.5375 -0.025 4 9986 1923 1923 0.3375 2.5625 -0.025 4 10470 1924 1924 0.3375 2.5875 -0.025 4 11451 1925 1925 0.3375 2.6125 -0.025 4 11909 1926 1926 0.3375 2.6375 -0.025 4 11334 1927 1927 0.3375 2.6625 -0.025 4 10656 1928 1928 0.3375 2.6875 -0.025 4 10464 1929 1929 0.3375 2.7125 -0.025 4 10690 1930 1930 0.3375 2.7375 -0.025 4 11564 1931 1931 0.3375...