Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "112d".
Did you mean:
1127
2011 Mar 26
2
[LLVMdev] Possible missed optimization?
...0L-phidef
32L %vreg5<def> = COPY %R25R24; PTRREGS:%vreg5
Not coalescable.
64L %vreg6<def> = COPY %vreg4<kill>; DLDREGS:%vreg6,%vreg4
Considering merging %vreg4 with %vreg6 to DLDREGS
RHS = %vreg4 = [48d,64d:0) 0 at 48d
LHS = %vreg6 = [64d,80d:1)[80d,112d:0) 0 at 80d 1 at 64d
updated: 48L %vreg6<def> = LDWRd %vreg5<kill>;
mem:LD2[%a](align=1)(tbaa=!"int") DLDREGS:%vreg6 PTRREGS:%vreg5
Joined. Result = %vreg6 = [48d,80d:1)[80d,112d:0) 0 at 80d 1 at 48d
96L %vreg8<def> = COPY %R25R24<kill>; PTRREGS...
2011 Mar 28
0
[LLVMdev] Possible missed optimization?
...lt;def> = COPY %R25R24; PTRREGS:%vreg5
> Not coalescable.
> 64L %vreg6<def> = COPY %vreg4<kill>; DLDREGS:%vreg6,%vreg4
> Considering merging %vreg4 with %vreg6 to DLDREGS
> RHS = %vreg4 = [48d,64d:0) 0 at 48d
> LHS = %vreg6 = [64d,80d:1)[80d,112d:0) 0 at 80d 1 at 64d
> updated: 48L %vreg6<def> = LDWRd %vreg5<kill>; mem:LD2[%a](align=1)(tbaa=!"int") DLDREGS:%vreg6 PTRREGS:%vreg5
> Joined. Result = %vreg6 = [48d,80d:1)[80d,112d:0) 0 at 80d 1 at 48d
> 96L %vreg8<def> = COPY %R25R24<ki...
2011 Mar 26
0
[LLVMdev] Possible missed optimization?
On Mar 26, 2011, at 1:04 PM, Borja Ferrer wrote:
> Hello Jakob, thanks for the reply. The three regclasses involved here are all subsets from each other and aren't disjoint. These are the basic descriptions of the regclasses involved to show what i mean:
>
> DREGS: R31R30, R29R28 down to R1R0 (16 regs)
> DLDREGS: R31R30, R29R28 down to R17R16 (8 regs)
> PTRREGS:
2011 Mar 26
2
[LLVMdev] Possible missed optimization?
Hello Jakob, thanks for the reply. The three regclasses involved here are
all subsets from each other and aren't disjoint. These are the basic
descriptions of the regclasses involved to show what i mean:
DREGS: R31R30, R29R28 down to R1R0 (16 regs)
DLDREGS: R31R30, R29R28 down to R17R16 (8 regs)
PTRREGS: R31R30, R29R28, R27R26 (3 regs)
All classes intersect each other
2008 Sep 22
2
Problem with booting/grub (?)
...x86_64 with latest
updates
Hardware:
AMD Athlon 64 x2 4200+ (2 x 2.0GHz), ECS NFORCE4M-A
4GB OCZ DDR2 800MHz (PC6400)
/dev/hda Maxtor 160MB PATA UDMA-133
/dev/hdb Maxtor 120MB PATA UDMA-133
/dev/sda Seagate 300GB SATA-150/300
/dev/sdb WD 320GB SATA-150/300
/dev/hdc Pioneer 1810 (DVR-112D) 18x DVD+/-RW/DL
/dev/hdd Pioneer 1810 (DVR-112D) 18x DVD+/-RW/DL
Thanks.
mhr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080922/cc7c32c4/attachment-0001.html>
2008 Jun 03
1
Network problems on new CentOS 5 install on P35, ICH9R mobo
...of Comcast IP.
To add to confusion, if I boot into old IDE drive, I get proper network
connection to internet, but lose my swap!
Particulars:
mobo=Gigabyte P35-DS3R
SATA Controller=AHCI
PATA Controller=JMicron 20360
new drive=ATA WDC WD1600AAJS-2
old drive=WDC WD400JB-00JJA0
DVD-RW=Pioneer DVR-112D (PATA)
NICs=eth0=Realtek RTL-8029(AS) (DHCP)
eth1=Realtek RTL-8029(AS) (Static)
Has anyone seen this? Will 5.2 help with this situation? Been working
on this for days!
Thanks,
Dick
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither l...
2016 Aug 23
3
Possible IMAP IDLE bug in Dovecot 2.2.18 and 2.2.25
...2.11][21425199] command: vw1a IDLE
16:08:15 [192.168.202.11][21425199] command: buw0 IDLE
16:08:15 [192.168.202.11][21425199] command: ogzd IDLE
16:08:15 [192.168.202.11][21425199] command: 4481 IDLE
16:08:15 [192.168.202.11][21425199] command: pvdz IDLE
16:08:15 [192.168.202.11][21425199] command: 112d IDLE
16:08:15 [192.168.202.11][21425199] command: ah3f IDLE
16:08:15 [192.168.202.11][21425199] command: pmj9 IDLE
16:08:15 [192.168.202.11][21425199] command: ljzk IDLE
16:08:15 [192.168.202.11][21425199] command: dbuv IDLE
16:08:15 [192.168.202.11][21425199] command: gb84 IDLE
16:08:15 [192.168.2...