search for: 112960

Hi, we are running several test installations of Samba 3 on Solaris 8 and Solaris 9. On Solaris 9, there is a strange behaviour in terms of getting secondary group information from LDAP. With later revisions of patch 112960, only /etc/group is interpreted, but there is no query on the LDAP server for (Unix-) group information. Here is a short overview about our results: common configuration: * OpenLDAP-Server * native Sun LDAP-Client * Samba 3.0.x (last: 3.0.2rc1) with LDAP support...

...ars, and I just noticed that a URL included in the HOWTO is broken now. Perhaps there are others as well. In section 39.6.2 "Winbind on Solaris 9" (p. 503), Solaris 9 users are directed to download a patch from the following URL: http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/findPatch.pl?patchId=112960;rev=14 But the Sun site redirects users to a newer, longer, mch uglier URL: http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/advsearch.do?collection=PATCH&type=collec tions&max=50&language=en&queryKey5=112960;rev=14&toDocument=yes (Yeah, that's all one line.) I just thought I shoul...

Hi, finally the compatibility problems between the LDAP libraries from Sun and OpenLDAP on Solaris 9, known as bug# 395, are solved. With Patch-ID 112960-22 everything is working as it should. Tests were OK for a Samba PDC with LDAP backend and a Samba fileserver with "security = ADS", both on Solaris 9 with native Sun LDAP client. Secondary group information is requested from the LDAP Server and file access rights are honoured from Samba...

...ups. Users cannot access files if the rights are based on a secondary group and if this information is stored on the LDAP server. Note that everything is ok with information from /etc/group and Unix authentication is working (login, id, groups, getent, ...). We are using the Sun LDAP client, Patch 112960-10. It seems that Samba doesn't seach the secondary groups on the LDAP server. I'd like to ask if this is the same behaviour as described in https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395 . Or is this a different bug or some sort of misconfiguration? I am a bit confused by the bug report...

We are implementing the following: Solaris 9 iPlanet Directory Server 5.1 (bundled with Solaris 9) openldap 2.1.16 Only used for ldap libaries (samba will not compile without. Is this other people's experience?) samba 2.2.8 compiled with ./configure --with-ldapsam --with-acl-support We have the samba server acting as a PDC with all user and machine accounts in LDAP as

I've got an issue with a fresh (and I mean really fresh) 3.0.5 + ldap server where doesn't seem to recognize unix group membership. The server was 2.2.8a last night and things were working. The unix side works flawlessly, in other words if I log in as myself I can get where I need to, but under samba I get nothing. Here's some supporting info: my group membership information:

I was wondering if any one else is having issues with supplementary groups not being recognized. It seems as if Samba is ignoring the sup.groups. I'm using RH9.0 on Intel with samba-3.0.0-2_rh9 and OpenLDAP 2.0.27. When I do a "id -a username" the user is in all the necessary groups but when accessing shares the users' primary GID is used only. For example, uid=1001(jgray)

I am trying to compile the small Samba 3.0.2a source on Solaris 9 to use ldap. The ./configure run reports: "WARNING: libldap is needed for LDAP support". The Solaris installation has it's native libldap installed in /usr/lib, but the configuration does not seem to find it. Would anyone know what I am missing? Thanks...dlb David Bost Dow Jones and Co. 4300 North Route 1 South

I have the following configuration: Solaris 9 (patch 112960-10 applied) Samba 3.0.8 (configure --with-ads --with-pam --with-winbind) MIT Kerberos 1.3.5 (configure --enable-dns --enable-dns-for-kdc --enable-dns-for-realm --without-tcl) I am using Samba to share files to our Windows users via a Samba share, security = ads. All the shares work just fine. He...

We are having what appears to be two main issues in our attempt to setup Samba 3.0.0 compiled from src on Solaris 8. We are using Samba to provide Unix shares on W2K clients, and to authenticate against a W2K Active Directory server. OpenLDAP is used on the Samba side for the UID/GID to SID mappings. The first issue deals with the file sharing. Even if a file gives full permission to one of a

...ap or a dedicated LDAP server. At this point you will be able to use Samba as per the documentation, having skipped the weeks of frustration people usually seem to spend to get this going :-) Solaris 9 Prep -------------- Install from the first three CDs, accepting all defaults. Install patches 112960-36, 112874-34, 112233-01, 112233-11 . This is a dependency chain, the only thing really required is a new libnss that will let Samba winbind work. On production machines, if you keep up with Sun recommended patches you may have this already. If you want to grow old quickly, attempt to build the en...

Hello, I''m working in configuring a very restrictive firewall to stick between our techroom and our internal network. Basically nothing should be allowed into the techroom and only a limited amount of traffic is to leave the techroom. Below are a few log entries I looking to get explained. DHCP is handled by the firewall, DNS is handled by servers side our techroom. my rules file

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:16:29PM -0800, Michael Dalton wrote: > Commit 2613af0ed18a ("virtio_net: migrate mergeable rx buffers to page frag > allocators") changed the mergeable receive buffer size from PAGE_SIZE to > MTU-size, introducing a single-stream regression for benchmarks with large > average packet size. There is no single optimal buffer size for all >

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:16:29PM -0800, Michael Dalton wrote: > Commit 2613af0ed18a ("virtio_net: migrate mergeable rx buffers to page frag > allocators") changed the mergeable receive buffer size from PAGE_SIZE to > MTU-size, introducing a single-stream regression for benchmarks with large > average packet size. There is no single optimal buffer size for all >