Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "112348".
Did you mean:
11234
2017 Jun 09
2
[Newbie Question] Compute a schedule region's scheduled cycles.
Also you might need to check use PostRASchedulerList or
PostMachineScheduler,
PostRASchedulerList is considered deprecated as mentioned in [1].
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-April/112348.html
HTH,
chenwj
2017-06-10 4:03 GMT+08:00 陳韋任 <chenwj.cs97g at g2.nctu.edu.tw>:
> Not saying I am totally understand how thing works, but I think you're
> misleading
> by the DAG in the class name ScheduleDAGInstrs. I only see MachineInstrs
> there, no SDNode. And the com...
2004 Nov 29
1
dynamic SNAT
Hу здpаcте shorewall-users,
can i make subj with shorewall? i enabled iproute2 (i have dial-up and LAN) for
some machine behind NAT. NAT network is 10.33.20.0/24 and ppp0 ip is given
dynamicly sooo... for me to make machine with 10.33.20.10 ip to go throught
new gate with given addres i need to perform subj (or so i think :-)).
PS: i''m not a constant subscriber...
2017 Jun 09
2
[Newbie Question] Compute a schedule region's scheduled cycles.
Hi All,
I am trying to construct a small optimization based on ScheduleDAGInstrs that does the following:
1. Find candidate nodes in the DAG, and speculatively modify the node (nodes).
2. After modification, try to compute the scheduled cycles of the region.
3. If the cycle number improves, go back to 1. to find the next candidate node.
I am thinking using
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...7823
code.ll 1 10232 0 0.01 10202 0 0.01 10202
CoderMixer2.ll 14 83683 4 0.01 81571 4 0.02 81571
CoderMixer2MT.ll 50 274089 5 0.02 266795 * * *
cofactor.ll 9 103705 0 0.02 103675 0 0.02 103675
color.ll 1 2069 0 0.01 2040 0 0.01 2040
cols.ll 13 64095 0 0.02 64065 0 0.02 64065
CommandLineParser.ll 11 112348 0 0.02 112321 0 0.02 112321
command.ll 5 18344 0 0.01 18327 0 0.01 18327
comment.ll 14 39393 1 0.01 37610 0 0.01 38745
common.ll 10 113372 0 0.02 113343 0 0.02 113343
communication_info.ll 3 187732 0 0.02 187703 0 0.02 187703
communication.ll 15 164724 0 0.02 164695 0 0.02 164695
compare.ll 3 3894...