search for: 111a

Hi,    I''ve been using xVM with no problems since 2009.06 release (centos4/5, rhel4/5, sol10 as guests). This was using the 111a version. Just installed a new server with the 111b version and .... virt-install --nographics -p -r 8192 -n CentOS_48_64_92 -f /dev/zvol/dsk/zm0/vm/CentOS_48_64_92 -l ftp://192.168.101.120/pub/CentOS-48 -w bridge=aggr0 --os-type=linux --os-variant=rhel4 Starting install... Retrieving file vmlin...

...000 3840 0006 e000 ffff ffff ..8@........ 13 1.01119 juva -> 192.108.34.255 UDP D=138 S=138 LEN=233 0: ffff ffff ffff 0000 c051 fecd 0800 4500 .........Q....E. 16: 00fd 0700 0000 8011 6ce3 c06c 2235 c06c ........l..l"5.l 32: 22ff 008a 008a 00e9 ce3a 111a 0006 c06c "........:.....l 48: 2235 008a 00d3 0000 2045 4b46 4646 4745 "5...... EKFFFGE 64: 4243 4143 4143 4143 4143 4143 4143 4143 BCACACACACACACAC 80: 4143 4143 4143 4141 4103 4544 5600 2045 ACACACAAA.EDV. E 96: 4b46 4646 4145 4a46 4545 4646 4343 4143 KFFFAEJF...

http://www.uniras.gov.uk/vuls/2004/236929/index.htm ----Quote---- "The impact of this vulnerability varies by vendor and application, but in some deployment scenarios it is rated critical. Please see the vendor section below for further information. Alternatively contact your vendor for product specific information. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow an attacker to create a

Forwarded message: > From full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com Wed Apr 21 11:49:12 2004 > To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com > From: Darren Bounds <dbounds@intrusense.com> > Subject: [Full-Disclosure] IETF Draft - Fix for TCP vulnerability > Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:19:58 -0400 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > >