search for: 110tb

For a high-performance system (64-cores, 512GB RAM, 5TB local disk, 110TB NFS-mounted storage) is there any advantage of dropping lvm and mounting partitions directly? We're not planning on changing partition sizes, but if we did we'd probably do a full rebuild. Has anyone done performance testing to show that lvm isn't crippling I/O? Thanx, Russell ======...

Hi, is it possible, to use DFS and show the correct values of free space? I set up a DFS-share located on filesystem1 (size 50GB) and linked shares of another server to this share (msdfs:<fs>\share): share1: size 110TB share2: size 50TB share3: size 20TB But connecting to the DFS-share, the disk size of this network drive ist 50GB. Unfortunately files larger than 50GB can not be copied to the network drive . Any ideas? Thanks and best, Alex

...tle while (would take more than 10 seconds). So we now delete it (and locks/locking.tdb that also tends to grow forever) and restart our samba processes every morning at 7 am - which gives us much more stable performance. > > - Servers with 256GB of RAM, 10Gbps ethernet interfaces and around 110TB of disk per server. > - FreeBSD 11.2-p2 > - Samba 4.7.6 with some local patches to allow (much) bigger socket listening queues in order to handle the case of many clients connecting at the same time. > > (We are trying to upgrade to a more recent Samba but 4.7.8 and 4.7.9 gave us horri...

Hi all, I have a midsize AD domain with some 50k users but only 100 workstations joined. Sometimes I find server CPU throttling at 100%. In order to let it drop and have smooth performance I delete cache: systemctl stop samba net cache flush systemctl start samba First of all, is it needed a samba stop to flush the cache? Even if cache flush does the job to restore performance, I am clueless

...tle while (would take more than 10 seconds). So we now delete it (and locks/locking.tdb that also tends to grow forever) and restart our samba processes every morning at 7 am - which gives us much more stable performance. > > - Servers with 256GB of RAM, 10Gbps ethernet interfaces and around 110TB of disk per server. > - FreeBSD 11.2-p2 > - Samba 4.7.6 with some local patches to allow (much) bigger socket listening queues in order to handle the case of many clients connecting at the same time. > > (We are trying to upgrade to a more recent Samba but 4.7.8 and 4.7.9 gave us horri...

...fter a little while (would take more than 10 seconds). So we now delete it (and locks/locking.tdb that also tends to grow forever) and restart our samba processes every morning at 7 am - which gives us much more stable performance. - Servers with 256GB of RAM, 10Gbps ethernet interfaces and around 110TB of disk per server. - FreeBSD 11.2-p2 - Samba 4.7.6 with some local patches to allow (much) bigger socket listening queues in order to handle the case of many clients connecting at the same time. (We are trying to upgrade to a more recent Samba but 4.7.8 and 4.7.9 gave us horrible authentication p...

...tle while (would take more than 10 seconds). So we now delete it (and locks/locking.tdb that also tends to grow forever) and restart our samba processes every morning at 7 am - which gives us much more stable performance. > > - Servers with 256GB of RAM, 10Gbps ethernet interfaces and around 110TB of disk per server. > - FreeBSD 11.2-p2 > - Samba 4.7.6 with some local patches to allow (much) bigger socket listening queues in order to handle the case of many clients connecting at the same time. > > (We are trying to upgrade to a more recent Samba but 4.7.8 and 4.7.9 gave us horri...

...e (would take more than 10 seconds). So we now delete it (and locks/locking.tdb that also tends to grow forever) and restart our samba processes every morning at 7 am - which gives us much more stable performance. >> >> - Servers with 256GB of RAM, 10Gbps ethernet interfaces and around 110TB of disk per server. >> - FreeBSD 11.2-p2 >> - Samba 4.7.6 with some local patches to allow (much) bigger socket listening queues in order to handle the case of many clients connecting at the same time. >> >> (We are trying to upgrade to a more recent Samba but 4.7.8 and 4.7...

...e (would take more than 10 seconds). So we now delete it (and locks/locking.tdb that also tends to grow forever) and restart our samba processes every morning at 7 am - which gives us much more stable performance. >> >> - Servers with 256GB of RAM, 10Gbps ethernet interfaces and around 110TB of disk per server. >> - FreeBSD 11.2-p2 >> - Samba 4.7.6 with some local patches to allow (much) bigger socket listening queues in order to handle the case of many clients connecting at the same time. >> >> (We are trying to upgrade to a more recent Samba but 4.7.8 and 4.7...