search for: 1104d

...on Linux with: > sudo samba-tool ntacl get /srv/samba/profiles --as-sddl I've not understood why you as me this, but, anyway: root at vdmacpn1:~# samba-tool ntacl get /srv/samba/profiles --as-sddl O:S-1-5-21-2656668478-4232595426-3015587126-1106G:S-1-5-21-2656668478-4232595426-3015587126-1104D:P(A;;0x001f01ff;;;S-1-5-21-2656668478-4232595426-3015587126-1106)(A;;0x001f01ff;;;S-1-5-21-2656668478-4232595426-3015587126-1104)(A;;0x001200a9;;;WD) Ah! I remember because i've set 'acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes': simply profile folders creation does not worked, and i've fid...

...samba-tool ntacl get /srv/samba/profiles --as-sddl > > I've not understood why you as me this, but, anyway: > > root at vdmacpn1:~# samba-tool ntacl get /srv/samba/profiles --as-sddl > O:S-1-5-21-2656668478-4232595426-3015587126-1106G:S-1-5-21-2656668478-4232595426-3015587126-1104D:P(A;;0x001f01ff;;;S-1-5-21-2656668478-4232595426-3015587126-1106)(A;;0x001f01ff;;;S-1-5-21-2656668478-4232595426-3015587126-1104)(A;;0x001200a9;;;WD) Before I fully reply to this, can you please tell me who or what have the RIDs 1104 and 1106 ? Rowland

On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 16:00:22 +0100 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > In a fresh samba AD domain i'm setting up the 'Profiles' share for > roaming profiles, following the wiki: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Roaming_Windows_User_Profiles > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs > >

...04r,1168B:2)  0 at 400r 1 at 448B-phi 2 at 1104r All defs dead: 400r%vreg47<def,dead> = COPY %C1_Y; R600_Reg32:%vreg47 Dead PHI at invalid may separate interval All defs dead: 1104r%vreg47<def,dead> = COPY %vreg27:sel_z; R600_Reg32:%vreg47 R600_Reg128:%vreg27 Shrunk: [400r,400d:0)[1104r,1104d:2)  0 at 400r 1 at x 2 at 1104r 2 components: [400r,400d:0)[1104r,1104d:1)  0 at 400r 1 at 1104r [400r,400d:0)  0 at 400r [1104r,1104d:0)  0 at 1104r Deleting dead def 1104r%vreg50<def,dead> = COPY %vreg27:sel_z; R600_Reg32:%vreg50 R600_Reg128:%vreg27 Deleting dead def 400r%vreg47<def,dead...

...at 448B-phi 2 at 1104r > All defs dead: 400r%vreg47<def,dead> = COPY %C1_Y; R600_Reg32:%vreg47 > Dead PHI at invalid may separate interval > All defs dead: 1104r%vreg47<def,dead> = COPY %vreg27:sel_z; > R600_Reg32:%vreg47 R600_Reg128:%vreg27 > Shrunk: [400r,400d:0)[1104r,1104d:2)  0 at 400r 1 at x 2 at 1104r > 2 components: [400r,400d:0)[1104r,1104d:1)  0 at 400r 1 at 1104r > [400r,400d:0)  0 at 400r > [1104r,1104d:0)  0 at 1104r > Deleting dead def 1104r%vreg50<def,dead> = COPY %vreg27:sel_z; > R600_Reg32:%vreg50 R600_Reg128:%vreg27 > Deleting d...

Hi Vincent, On 24/10/2012 23:26, Vincent Lejeune wrote: > Hi, > > I don't know if my llvm ir code is faulty, or if I spot a bug in the RegisterCoalescing Pass, so I'm posting my issue on the ML. Shader and print-before-all dump are given below. > > The interessing part is the vreg6/vreg48 reduction : before RegCoalescing, the machine code is : > > // BEFORE LOOP >

Hi, I don't know if my llvm ir code is faulty, or if I spot a bug in the RegisterCoalescing Pass, so I'm posting my issue on the ML. Shader and print-before-all dump are given below. The interessing part is the vreg6/vreg48 reduction : before RegCoalescing, the machine code is : // BEFORE LOOP ... Some COPYs.... 400B%vreg47<def> = COPY %vreg2<kill>; R600_Reg32:%vreg47,%vreg2