search for: 1103,17

...->cmd_code = CCW_CMD_SET_CONF_IND; ccw->flags = 0; - ccw->count = sizeof(&vcdev->indicators2); + ccw->count = sizeof(indicators2(vcdev)); ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long) indicatorp; ret = ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw, VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_SET_CONF_IND); if (ret) @@ -1093,17 +1103,17 @@ static void virtio_ccw_int_handler(struct ccw_device *cdev, vcdev->err = -EIO; } virtio_ccw_check_activity(vcdev, activity); - for_each_set_bit(i, &vcdev->indicators, - sizeof(vcdev->indicators) * BITS_PER_BYTE) { + for_each_set_bit(i, indicators(vcdev), + sizeof(*i...

...->cmd_code = CCW_CMD_SET_CONF_IND; ccw->flags = 0; - ccw->count = sizeof(&vcdev->indicators2); + ccw->count = sizeof(indicators2(vcdev)); ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long) indicatorp; ret = ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw, VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_SET_CONF_IND); if (ret) @@ -1093,17 +1103,17 @@ static void virtio_ccw_int_handler(struct ccw_device *cdev, vcdev->err = -EIO; } virtio_ccw_check_activity(vcdev, activity); - for_each_set_bit(i, &vcdev->indicators, - sizeof(vcdev->indicators) * BITS_PER_BYTE) { + for_each_set_bit(i, indicators(vcdev), + sizeof(*i...

...->cmd_code = CCW_CMD_SET_CONF_IND; ccw->flags = 0; - ccw->count = sizeof(&vcdev->indicators2); + ccw->count = sizeof(indicators2(vcdev)); ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long) indicatorp; ret = ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw, VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_SET_CONF_IND); if (ret) @@ -1093,17 +1103,17 @@ static void virtio_ccw_int_handler(struct ccw_device *cdev, vcdev->err = -EIO; } virtio_ccw_check_activity(vcdev, activity); - for_each_set_bit(i, &vcdev->indicators, - sizeof(vcdev->indicators) * BITS_PER_BYTE) { + for_each_set_bit(i, indicators(vcdev), + sizeof(*i...

...@@ -1095,7 +1093,6 @@ static const struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs nv04_crtc_helper_funcs = { .mode_set = nv_crtc_mode_set, .mode_set_base = nv04_crtc_mode_set_base, .mode_set_base_atomic = nv04_crtc_mode_set_base_atomic, - .load_lut = nv_crtc_gamma_load, .disable = nv_crtc_disable, }; @@ -1103,17 +1100,12 @@ int nv04_crtc_create(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc_num) { struct nouveau_crtc *nv_crtc; - int ret, i; + int ret; nv_crtc = kzalloc(sizeof(*nv_crtc), GFP_KERNEL); if (!nv_crtc) return -ENOMEM; - for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) { - nv_crtc->lut.r[i] = i << 8; -...

...@@ -1095,7 +1093,6 @@ static const struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs nv04_crtc_helper_funcs = { .mode_set = nv_crtc_mode_set, .mode_set_base = nv04_crtc_mode_set_base, .mode_set_base_atomic = nv04_crtc_mode_set_base_atomic, - .load_lut = nv_crtc_gamma_load, .disable = nv_crtc_disable, }; @@ -1103,17 +1100,12 @@ int nv04_crtc_create(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc_num) { struct nouveau_crtc *nv_crtc; - int ret, i; + int ret; nv_crtc = kzalloc(sizeof(*nv_crtc), GFP_KERNEL); if (!nv_crtc) return -ENOMEM; - for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) { - nv_crtc->lut.r[i] = i << 8; -...

...@@ -1095,7 +1093,6 @@ static const struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs nv04_crtc_helper_funcs = { .mode_set = nv_crtc_mode_set, .mode_set_base = nv04_crtc_mode_set_base, .mode_set_base_atomic = nv04_crtc_mode_set_base_atomic, - .load_lut = nv_crtc_gamma_load, .disable = nv_crtc_disable, }; @@ -1103,17 +1100,12 @@ int nv04_crtc_create(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc_num) { struct nouveau_crtc *nv_crtc; - int ret, i; + int ret; nv_crtc = kzalloc(sizeof(*nv_crtc), GFP_KERNEL); if (!nv_crtc) return -ENOMEM; - for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) { - nv_crtc->lut.r[i] = i << 8; -...

...@@ -1095,7 +1093,6 @@ static const struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs nv04_crtc_helper_funcs = { .mode_set = nv_crtc_mode_set, .mode_set_base = nv04_crtc_mode_set_base, .mode_set_base_atomic = nv04_crtc_mode_set_base_atomic, - .load_lut = nv_crtc_gamma_load, .disable = nv_crtc_disable, }; @@ -1103,17 +1100,12 @@ int nv04_crtc_create(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc_num) { struct nouveau_crtc *nv_crtc; - int ret, i; + int ret; nv_crtc = kzalloc(sizeof(*nv_crtc), GFP_KERNEL); if (!nv_crtc) return -ENOMEM; - for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) { - nv_crtc->lut.r[i] = i << 8; -...

Hi! While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved by the core. This is my attempt to do it right. I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile, but patches 1 and 3 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver do what I need. The rest is

Hi! While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved by the core. This is my attempt to do it right. I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile, but patches 1 and 3 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver do what I need. The rest is

Hi! While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved by the core. This is my attempt to do it right. I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile, but patches 1 through 5 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver do what I need. The rest

Hi! While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved by the core. This is my attempt to do it right. I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile, but patches 1 through 5 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver do what I need. The rest

Hi! While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved by the core. This is my attempt to do it right. I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile, but patches 1 through 5 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver do what I need. The rest

Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly. Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the terminology used. * Protected Virtualization (PV): Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest that operates in PV

Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly. Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the terminology used. * Protected Virtualization (PV): Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest that operates in PV

Hi! While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved by the core. This is my attempt to do it right. Boris and Daniel, was this approximately what you had in mind? I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile, but the first patch is

Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly. Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the terminology used. * Protected Virtualization (PV): Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest that operates in PV

Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly. Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the terminology used. * Protected Virtualization (PV): Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest that operates in PV

Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly. Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the terminology used. * Protected Virtualization (PV): Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest that operates in PV

Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly. Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the terminology used. * Protected Virtualization (PV): Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest that operates in PV

Hi! While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved by the core. This is my attempt to do it right. I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile, but patches 1 and 3 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver do what I need (when patched