search for: 1102,22

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "1102,22".

Did you mean: 110,22
2018 May 16
0
[RFC V4 PATCH 7/8] vhost: packed ring support
...@ static void vhost_vq_reset(struct vhost_dev *dev, vhost_reset_is_le(vq); vhost_disable_cross_endian(vq); vq->busyloop_timeout = 0; + vq->used_wrap_counter = true; + vq->avail_wrap_counter = true; vq->umem = NULL; vq->iotlb = NULL; __vhost_vq_meta_reset(vq); @@ -1100,11 +1102,22 @@ static int vhost_iotlb_miss(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, u64 iova, int access) return 0; } -static bool vq_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int num, - struct vring_desc __user *desc, - struct vring_avail __user *avail, - struct vring_used __user *used) +static int v...
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH 1/3] Paravirtualization: Kernel Ring Cleanups
Hi all, I've been looking at finding common ground between the VMI, Xen and other paravirtualization approaches, and after some discussion, we're getting somewhere. These first two patches are the fundamentals, stolen mainly from the VMI patches: removing assumptions about the kernel running in ring 0, and macro-izing all the obvious para-virtualize-needing insns. The third patch is
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH 1/3] Paravirtualization: Kernel Ring Cleanups
Hi all, I've been looking at finding common ground between the VMI, Xen and other paravirtualization approaches, and after some discussion, we're getting somewhere. These first two patches are the fundamentals, stolen mainly from the VMI patches: removing assumptions about the kernel running in ring 0, and macro-izing all the obvious para-virtualize-needing insns. The third patch is
2018 May 16
12
[RFC V4 PATCH 0/8] Packed ring layout for vhost
Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V3 ahttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/25/34. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run for event index. Pktgen reports about 20% improvement on PPS (event index is off). More testing is ongoing. Notes for tester: - Start from this version, vhost need qemu co-operation to work
2018 May 16
12
[RFC V4 PATCH 0/8] Packed ring layout for vhost
Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V3 ahttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/25/34. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run for event index. Pktgen reports about 20% improvement on PPS (event index is off). More testing is ongoing. Notes for tester: - Start from this version, vhost need qemu co-operation to work