search for: 10u2

Hi, I deployed ZFS on our mailserver recently, hoping for eternal peace after running on UFS and moving files witch each TB added. It is mailserver - it''s mdirs are on ZFS pool: capacity operations bandwidth pool used avail read write read write ------------------------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

...9;ll see all these up to the minute bug fixes in the Solaris 10 update that brings ZFS to that product, or if there is a specific date where no further updates will make it in to the product? I ask as I''m trying to make a decision to go live with a Solaris Express build or wait for Solaris 10U2 for SPARC systems. Second, in testing out nexenta gnu/solaris, which happens to package the coreutils revision of du, I''ve found a bug in that program. A du on a snapshot or other .zfs entity causes this error: du: fts_read failed: No such file or directory fts_read in previous bug repo...

I just added auth caching with pam, and I'm getting this error: dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] auth(default): file passdb.c: line 178 (passdb_init): assertion failed: (passdb->passdb->default_pass_scheme != NULL || passdb->passdb->cache_key == NULL) A google search turns up <http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot-cvs/2005-March/004117.html> which looks approx like this

Hi, OpenSSH 5.2 is almost ready for release, so we would appreciate testing on as many platforms and systems as possible. This is primarily a bug-fix release, to follow the feature-focused 5.1 release. Snapshot releases for portable OpenSSH are available from http://www.mindrot.org/openssh_snap/ The OpenBSD version is available in CVS HEAD: http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html Portable

Hello all, After setting up a Solaris 10 machine with ZFS as the new NFS server, I''m stumped by some serious performance problems. Here are the (admittedly long) details (also noted at http://www.netmeister.org/blog/): The machine in question is a dual-amd64 box with 2GB RAM and two broadcom gigabit NICs. The OS is Solaris 10 6/06 and the filesystem consists of a single zpool stripe

...currently understand, the general advice would seem to be to assign a filesystem to each user, and to set a quota on that. I can see this being OK for small numbers of users (up to 1000 maybe), but I can also see it being a bit tedious for larger numbers than that. I just tried a quick test on Sol10u2: for x in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9; do for y in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9; do zfs create testpool/$x$y; zfs set quota=1024k testpool/$x$y done; done [apologies for the formatting - is there any way to preformat text on this forum?] It ran OK for a minute or so, but then I got a slew of errors:...