search for: 10krpm

My apology for cross posting We have a DELL6850 with 8Gbytes of memory, four 3.2Ghz CPU's , perc 4 raid controller, with fourteen 300Gbyte 10Krpm disk on a powervault 220s, And a powervault 124T LTO-3 tape systems on a separate 160Mbyte/sec adaptec SCSI card. The disks are configured as two 2Tbyte raid 0 partitions using the perc 4 hardware. The problem is - reading from the disk, and writing to the tape is pathetically slow. The specs sa...

Hello! Our company have 2 sun 7110 with the following configuration: Primary: 7110 with 2 qc 1.9ghz HE opterons and 32GB ram 16 2.5" 10Krpm sas disc (2 system, 1 spare) a pool is configured from the rest so we have 13 active working discs in raidz-2 (called main) there is a sun J4200 jbod connected to this device with 12x750GB discs with 1 spare and 11active discs there is another pool configured (called JBOD) Backup: 7110 (converted...

...Just curious really. They're both stripped binaries in case thats what you were thinking. ;) Some maybe helpful info: Network: HP2824 24 port gigE switch Push Server: Software: RedHat Linux 8.0 - Kernel 2.4.20-28.8, ext3 fs, rsync 2.6.0 Hardware: P4 2.2Ghz, i850 chipset, 1GB DDR RAM, 4xSCSI 10krpm-U160 drives in software RAID10. Intel e1000 32-bit NIC. Receiving Servers: Software: RH8.0, various kernels, ext3 fs, rsync 2.5.7 Hardware: ranging from dual p3-800's to dual P4-3.0Ghz, 1GB RAM - 4GB RAM. Some IDE, some SCSI disks in RAID10, RAID0, or RAID1 depending on the box. Some gigE, som...

Dear support, I need to export gluster volume with LIO for a virtualization system. In this moment I have a very basic test configuration: 2x HP 380 G7(2 * Intel X5670 (Six core @ 2,93GHz), 72GB ram, hd RAID10 6xsas 10krpm, lan Intel X540 T2 10GB) directly interconnected. Gluster configuration is replica 2. OS is Fedora 27 For my tests I used dd and I found strange results. Apparently the volume mounted locally and exported with LIO is more faster than the same volume exported directly with LIO. For my tests I e...

...to prevent / load balance the situtation? Will i better off in using other binding? e.g. python? Will i better off in using distributed search? My goal is to optimize the search, while the doc size will grow to very big,e.g. 100M+ My testing suit is using: Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz 8G ram 1x 10krpm WD HD My live servers: Dell R710 2x E5530 2.4G 24G RAM 1333MHz 8x 73G 15K RPM SAS raid 0 Cheers Andrey

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Howdy - we have a bunch of dual processor Compaqs with 180GB RAID partitions for email, running with ext2 for the last year or so. I thought I'd try out ext3 (on our development machine :-) to see whether it was a practical proposition for this kind of thing yet. Appears to be working so far, with a

Recently, I''ve been reading through the ZIL/slog discussion and have the impression that a lot of folks here are (like me) interested in getting a viable solution for a cheap, fast and reliable ZIL device. I think I can provide such a solution for about $200, but it involves a lot of development work. The basic idea: the main problem when using a HDD as a ZIL device are the cache flushes

Hello All, I'm running Samba 3.0.24 as PDC and file server on Gentoo Linux, AMD64, 2.6.19 kernel, 100MBit/s network, and experience quite slow file transfers from Samba to WinXP SP2 clients: the speed is varying, but is about 1-2Mb/s at best. I spent quite some time investigating the issue, here are the intermediate results: 1) This happens only when transferring _from_ _Samba_ to

...ote: > > m,any concurrent connections as possible. Trying to guesstimate the amount > > of RAM, CPU cycles, IO bandwidth required on the server. actually, i have a real-world site with about 40 developers on a 100Mb switched LAN. here are my numbers: File System: 110GB RAID0 ext2, 3X 10kRPM SCSI LVD on 2 channels, about 75MB/second real world disk thruput. OS: Linux 2.4.2, stock redhat 7.1 kernel. Samba: 2.0.8-1.7.1, either downloaded from samba.org or what came with redhat, installed via RPM. I tested 2.2-HEAD, but it was not stable. (altho it was about 10% faster) CPU: PIII 800,...