search for: 10d06659

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "10d06659".

2013 Aug 01
0
[LLVMdev] Intended semantics for ``fence seq_cst``
...rchitecture-specific optimizations > You will need to do this in the frontend. The target independent optimizers are allowed to use the memory model. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130731/10d06659/attachment.html>
2013 Aug 01
2
[LLVMdev] Intended semantics for ``fence seq_cst``
> FWIW, I don't think we should add that, because it's an attempt to > define behavior that's undefined for other reasons (the data race on > the volatile). I had a discussion with Chandler and others, and something I misunderstood was pointed out: it is not an explicit goal of LLVM to support or continue supporting legacy code that did what it had to to express functional