search for: 10978

Hi, May this be an oversight? R version 2.6.2 Patched (2008-03-13 r44783) Copyright (C) 2008 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN 3-900051-07-0 ... > x <- "ab?" > Encoding(x) [1] "latin1" > Encoding(gsub("?","", x)) [1] "unknown" > Encoding(gsub("?","", x, perl = TRUE)) [1] "latin1"

...shown to work correctly. </QUOTE> However currently latest gcc version in Cygwin is 3.3.3. So, it seems that currently it is impossible to build LLVM and the GCC front-end under Cygwin (?). Alex Vinokur email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn

...raction penalty benchmark - tech report : D4 - comparing function objects to function pointers - tech report : D5 - measuring the cost of synchronized I/O - virtual vs. ordinary methods -- Alex Vinokur email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn

...GCC website (http://gcc.gnu.org), compile it with GCC 3.3.3 that came with Cygwin, and then use your newly built GCC 3.4.3 compiler to build LLVM and the LLVM GCC frontend. -- John T. > Alex Vinokur > email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com > http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html > http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn > >_______________________________________________ >LLVM Developers mailing list >LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >

...e it with GCC 3.3.3 that came > with Cygwin, and then use your newly built GCC 3.4.3 compiler to build > LLVM and the LLVM GCC frontend. > > -- John T. > > > Alex Vinokur > > email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com > > http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html > > http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn > > > >_______________________________________________ > >LLVM Developers mailing list > >LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > >http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > >...

...n. * It is compiled fine with g++ 3.3. * It isn't compiled with g++ 3.4. I have such a problem with my other projects. I should update C/C++ Perfometer to suit it to g++ 3.4. Thanks again. -- Alex Vinokur email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn

..... GCC Front End Binaries for Solaris/Sparc (6.6M) e.. GCC Front End Binaries for MacOS X/PowerPC (7.0M) f.. GCC Front End Source Code (30.0M) What do I have to dowonload for for Cygwin? -- Alex Vinokur email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn _______________________________________________ LLVM Developers mailing list LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev _________________________________________________________________...

...[options...] % gmake tools-only 2.1. Which options should I use with ./configure [options...]? 2.2. Cygwin doesn't have gmake: $ which gmake gmake: Command not found. Could I use make? -- Alex Vinokur email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn

...d.. GCC Front End Binaries for Solaris/Sparc (6.6M) e.. GCC Front End Binaries for MacOS X/PowerPC (7.0M) f.. GCC Front End Source Code (30.0M) What do I have to dowonload for for Cygwin? -- Alex Vinokur email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn

...<r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch> UNIT TRIAL Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 1 109 1 NA NA NA 13718 3655 15240 2 109 2 15000 6000 30000 13057 6198 21962 3 109 3 10000 10000 20000 8356 12929 27992 4 109 4 10000 10000 20000 12642 10978 34843 5 109 5 20000 20000 40000 10335 25754 64060 6 109 6 20000 20000 40000 4591 23706 30256 7 109 7 20000 20000 40000 5743 29107 43887 8 109 8 2000 20000 22000 7800 17717 35294 I want to structure this graph to present 3 screens that each repre...

...A000010", "A000020", "A000030", "A000040", "A000050", "A000060")), index = structure(c(10956, 10957, 10958, 10959, 10960, 10961, 10962, 10963, 10964, 10965, 10966, 10967, 10968, 10969, 10970, 10971, 10972, 10973, 10974, 10975, 10976, 10977, 10978, 10979, 10980, 10981, 10982, 10983, 10984, 10985, 10986, 10987, 10988, 10989, 10990), class = "Date"), class = "zoo") [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...chmarks as the Cygwin "layer" over Win32 is fairly > involved. > [snip] Thank you for that information. I will wait until you get Cygwin issues figured out. How can I know of that? Alex Vinokur email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn

On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 08:13:21AM +0200, Alex Vinokur wrote: > Thank you for that information. I will wait until you get Cygwin > issues figured out. How can I know of that? Check out the link to the Cygwin nightly tester results here: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/ Wait until most of the asterisks in the test results go away. :) The tester runs nightly, so checking every few

...iuc.edu/testresults/ * http://llvm.x10sys.com/testresults/Cygwin/ By the way, is it possible to send a relevant announce to * gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.announce * gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel Alex Vinokur email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn

On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 10:52:28PM -0800, Reid Spencer wrote: > On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 22:42, Misha Brukman wrote: > > > This would be the right one, so maybe if we ask Reid nicely, he'll > > do it (as he maintains the Cygwin nightly tester). > > I haven't used Net News since its signal-to-noise ratio dropped below > my tolerance level (circa 1995). However, if

On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 08:37:46AM +0200, Alex Vinokur wrote: > But it seems that there are no asterisks at > * http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/ > * http://llvm.x10sys.com/testresults/Cygwin/ That's because there was a build error (see the big red notice). Check out http://llvm.x10sys.com/testresults/Cygwin/2004-12-27.html > By the way, is it possible to send a relevant

On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Alex Vinokur wrote: > > have less impact than for a CPU bound program). In any case, I've added > > this program to the LLVM testsuite as > > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib.cpp, so we should have numbers for > > it generated every night on multiple platforms. > > > [snip] > > Newsgroup

On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Alex Vinokur wrote: > I would like to use LLVM-GCC to compare its performance with other compilers. > Something like testsuite "Computing very large Fibonacci numbers" at > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c%2B%2B.perfometer/37. Out of curiousity, I ran some quick tests on a AMD Athlon(TM) MP 2100+ box running Redhat linux 7.1. With the LLVM C

Alex Vinokur wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to use LLVM-GCC to compare its performance with other compilers. > Something like testsuite "Computing very large Fibonacci numbers" at > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c%2B%2B.perfometer/37. > > > My environment: > ----------------- > Windows 2000 > Cygwin > $ uname -srom > CYGWIN_NT-5.0

I have a Samba-ad-dc node no longer listening on port 135 making it impossible to replicate to it and It is holding up a domain upgrade. I appended the testparam output to give someone a chance to tell me how I mis-configured it. Is it possible to configure these these Domain Controllers to replicate over LDAP instead of RPC? -------------- next part -------------- Press enter to see a dump of