Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "108bf814".
Did you mean:
1082814
2015 Nov 02
2
[cfe-dev] [RFC][libcxx] Fix and maintain the no-exceptions build of libcxx
> I find it amusing that you think that there's a "correct behavior" when the standard specifies
> that an operation should throw an exception and you have disabled exceptions.
You got me there!
I think it's OK to be consistent across all the places and call abort(), this is what I've been doing
in my current patch. I will double check this behavior with other