Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "107860".
Did you mean:
10780
2010 Jul 08
0
[LLVMdev] LLC Bug x86 with thread local storage
...t of it.
Unfortunately we're really short on testcases here. :) I've made
an attempt that works for the current test and passes our set of tests
in:
Sending lib/Target/X86/X86Instr64bit.td
Sending test/CodeGen/X86/x86-64-tls-1.ll
Transmitting file data ..
Committed revision 107860.
Going to need some more testcases soon though if you run into
any more problems :)
-eric
2010 Jul 07
4
[LLVMdev] LLC Bug x86 with thread local storage
On Jul 7, 2010, at 4:52 AM, Patrick Marlier wrote:
> Which one is correct ?
> - movl $tm_nest_level at TPOFF, %ecx
> or
> - movq $tm_nest_level at TPOFF, %rcx
> or
> - movl tm_nest_level at TPOFF, %ecx
>
I believe this is initial exec and so from:
http://people.redhat.com/drepper/tls.pdf
it would be movl tm_nest_level at TPOFF, %ecx
> Otherwise, Is there a