search for: 107686

...0.244 >> table(A11) > > 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 > 2 17 40 129 334 883 2026 4522 8766 15786 > 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 > 26850 42142 59535 78851 96217 107686 112438 108237 95761 78737 > 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 > 59732 41474 26939 16006 8827 4633 2050 865 340 116 > 64 65 66 67 > 38 13 7 1 >> > > For a 2x2 table, there's re...

Hello, While doing some enrichment tests using chisq.test() with simulated p-values, I noticed some strange behaviour. The computed p-value was extremely small, so I decided to dig a little deeper and debug chisq.test(). I noticed then that the simulated statistics returned by the following call tmp <- .Call(C_chisq_sim, sr, sc, B, E) were all the same, very small numbers. This, at first,

...ystem elapsed 0.218 0.025 0.244 > table(A11) 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 2 17 40 129 334 883 2026 4522 8766 15786 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 26850 42142 59535 78851 96217 107686 112438 108237 95761 78737 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 59732 41474 26939 16006 8827 4633 2050 865 340 116 64 65 66 67 38 13 7 1 > For a 2x2 table, there's really only one degree of freedom, hen...

...elapsed 0.218 0.025 0.244 > table(A11) 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 2 17 40 129 334 883 2026 4522 8766 15786 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 26850 42142 59535 78851 96217 107686 112438 108237 95761 78737 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 59732 41474 26939 16006 8827 4633 2050 865 340 116 64 65 66 67 38 13 7 1 > For a 2x2 table, there's really only one degree of freedo...

....025 0.244 >> table(A11) > > 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 > 2 17 40 129 334 883 2026 4522 8766 15786 > 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 > 26850 42142 59535 78851 96217 107686 112438 108237 95761 78737 > 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 > 59732 41474 26939 16006 8827 4633 2050 865 340 116 > 64 65 66 67 > 38 13 7 1 >> > > For a 2x2 table, there's really...