search for: 1065862

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1065862".

Did you mean: 1035862
2018 Nov 27
2
[RFC][llvm-mca] Adding binary support to llvm-mca.
Thanks for clarifying it Matt. In general, I quite like your suggested design. My only concern is about the semantic of the two new intrinsics. You design doesn't allow mca ranges to span through multiple basic blocks. That constraint is acceptable for now, since llvm-mca doesn't know how to deal with control flow. However, I am a bit concerned about what might happen in future if we