Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1062915".
Did you mean:
1062195
2017 Apr 17
2
[RFC] Adding CPS call support
(Sorry for the 2nd email Eli, I forgot to reply-all).
> I'm not following how explicitly representing the return address of a call in the IR before isel actually solves any relevant issue. We already pass the return address implicitly as an argument to every call; you can retrieve it with llvm.returnaddress if you need it.
Unfortunately the @llvm.returnaddress intrinsic does not solve