Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1060469".
Did you mean:
1000469
2017 Jan 02
2
RFC: Allowing @llvm.objectsize to be more conservative with null.
Hi George,
Have you considered changing our existing behavior to match GCC's
builtin_object_size instead of adding a new parameter? That may be
simpler overall. There's also a clear upgrade strategy -- fold every
old style call to "<min> ? 0 : 1".
You probably already know this, but GCC folds
builtin_object_size(0, 0) to -1 and builtin_object_size(0, 2) to 0.
We'll