Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "106.918".
2012 Nov 23
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] costing optimisations
On 23/11/2012, at 5:46 PM, Sean Silva wrote:
> Adding LLVMdev, since this is intimately related to the optimization passes.
>
>> I think this is roughly because some function level optimisations are
>> worse than O(N) in the number of instructions.
>
> Please profile this and mail llvmdev regarding passes with
> significantly superlinear behavior (e.g. O(n^2)). My
2012 Nov 23
5
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] costing optimisations
Adding LLVMdev, since this is intimately related to the optimization passes.
> I think this is roughly because some function level optimisations are
> worse than O(N) in the number of instructions.
Please profile this and mail llvmdev regarding passes with
significantly superlinear behavior (e.g. O(n^2)). My understanding is
that these kinds of algorithmic problems are generally considered
2012 Nov 23
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] costing optimisations
On 23.11.2012, at 15:12, john skaller <skaller at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> On 23/11/2012, at 5:46 PM, Sean Silva wrote:
>
>> Adding LLVMdev, since this is intimately related to the optimization passes.
>>
>>> I think this is roughly because some function level optimisations are
>>> worse than O(N) in the number of instructions.
>>