Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1059173".
Did you mean:
105173
2016 Oct 12
4
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4
> On Oct 11, 2016, at 1:46 PM, Michael Kuperstein via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> To the best of my understanding - because we want to be able to bootstrap clang with the system compiler that ships with various linux and BSD distributions.
> Windows has no equivalent concept.
I mean no offense to linux/BSD developers, but should we have a discussion (in