Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "1058,14".
Did you mean:
105,14
2014 Jun 02
2
[PATCH] NTFS: fix incorrect file->offset usage in ntfs_readdir
...;andy at r-tt.com>
---
diff -uprN syslinux-6.03-pre12.orig/core/fs/ntfs/ntfs.c
syslinux-6.03-pre12/core/fs/ntfs/ntfs.c
--- syslinux-6.03-pre12.orig/core/fs/ntfs/ntfs.c 2014-05-26
20:30:30.000000000 -0400
+++ syslinux-6.03-pre12/core/fs/ntfs/ntfs.c 2014-06-02
13:16:03.000000000 -0400
@@ -1058,14 +1058,13 @@ static int ntfs_readdir(struct file *fil
attr->data.resident.value_offset);
if (!file->offset && readdir_state->in_idx_root) {
- file->offset = (uint32_t)((uint8_t *)&ir->index +
-...
2014 Jun 02
0
[PATCH] NTFS: fix incorrect file->offset usage in ntfs_readdir
...;andy at r-tt.com>
---
diff -uprN syslinux-6.03-pre12.orig/core/fs/ntfs/ntfs.c
syslinux-6.03-pre12/core/fs/ntfs/ntfs.c
--- syslinux-6.03-pre12.orig/core/fs/ntfs/ntfs.c 2014-05-26
20:30:30.000000000 -0400
+++ syslinux-6.03-pre12/core/fs/ntfs/ntfs.c 2014-06-02
13:16:03.000000000 -0400
@@ -1058,14 +1058,13 @@ static int ntfs_readdir(struct file *fil
attr->data.resident.value_offset);
if (!file->offset && readdir_state->in_idx_root) {
- file->offset = (uint32_t)((uint8_t *)&ir->index +
-...
2014 Dec 11
0
[PATCH RFC v6 07/20] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout
...- qemu_put_be64(f, vdev->vq[i].pa);
+ /* XXX virtio-1 devices */
+ qemu_put_be64(f, vdev->vq[i].vring.desc);
qemu_put_be16s(f, &vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx);
if (k->save_queue) {
k->save_queue(qbus->parent, i, f);
@@ -1044,13 +1058,14 @@ int virtio_load(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f, int version_id)
if (k->has_variable_vring_alignment) {
vdev->vq[i].vring.align = qemu_get_be32(f);
}
- vdev->vq[i].pa = qemu_get_be64(f);
+ vdev->vq[i].vring.desc = qemu_get_be64(f);...
2014 Dec 11
0
[PATCH RFC v6 07/20] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout
...- qemu_put_be64(f, vdev->vq[i].pa);
+ /* XXX virtio-1 devices */
+ qemu_put_be64(f, vdev->vq[i].vring.desc);
qemu_put_be16s(f, &vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx);
if (k->save_queue) {
k->save_queue(qbus->parent, i, f);
@@ -1044,13 +1058,14 @@ int virtio_load(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f, int version_id)
if (k->has_variable_vring_alignment) {
vdev->vq[i].vring.align = qemu_get_be32(f);
}
- vdev->vq[i].pa = qemu_get_be64(f);
+ vdev->vq[i].vring.desc = qemu_get_be64(f);...
2015 Jan 22
2
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v6 07/20] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout
...->vq[i].pa);
> + /* XXX virtio-1 devices */
> + qemu_put_be64(f, vdev->vq[i].vring.desc);
> qemu_put_be16s(f, &vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx);
> if (k->save_queue) {
> k->save_queue(qbus->parent, i, f);
> @@ -1044,13 +1058,14 @@ int virtio_load(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f, int version_id)
> if (k->has_variable_vring_alignment) {
> vdev->vq[i].vring.align = qemu_get_be32(f);
> }
> - vdev->vq[i].pa = qemu_get_be64(f);
> + vdev->vq[i].vring.desc...
2015 Jan 22
2
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v6 07/20] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout
...->vq[i].pa);
> + /* XXX virtio-1 devices */
> + qemu_put_be64(f, vdev->vq[i].vring.desc);
> qemu_put_be16s(f, &vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx);
> if (k->save_queue) {
> k->save_queue(qbus->parent, i, f);
> @@ -1044,13 +1058,14 @@ int virtio_load(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f, int version_id)
> if (k->has_variable_vring_alignment) {
> vdev->vq[i].vring.align = qemu_get_be32(f);
> }
> - vdev->vq[i].pa = qemu_get_be64(f);
> + vdev->vq[i].vring.desc...
2014 Dec 11
45
[PATCH RFC v6 00/20] qemu: towards virtio-1 host support
And yet another iteration of virtio-1 support in qemu, tested with the
latest virtio kernel patches. Find it at
git://github.com/cohuck/qemu virtio-1
Changes from v5:
- fixed stupid bug in "virtio: support more feature bits": we need to
define a proper prop backend for 64 bit wide handling...
- don't negotiate revision 1 unless VERSION_1 is offered
- use 64 bit wide features
2014 Dec 11
45
[PATCH RFC v6 00/20] qemu: towards virtio-1 host support
And yet another iteration of virtio-1 support in qemu, tested with the
latest virtio kernel patches. Find it at
git://github.com/cohuck/qemu virtio-1
Changes from v5:
- fixed stupid bug in "virtio: support more feature bits": we need to
define a proper prop backend for 64 bit wide handling...
- don't negotiate revision 1 unless VERSION_1 is offered
- use 64 bit wide features
2016 Oct 11
10
[PATCH 0/8] Secure Boot refactoring
Hi everyone,
Apologies for the big patchset. This is a rework of the secure boot code that
moves the building of the blob into its own set of source files (and own hooks),
making the code more flexible and (hopefully) easier to understand as well.
This rework is needed to support more signed firmware for existing and new
chips. Since the firmwares in question are not available yet I cannot send