search for: 1056090

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1056090".

Did you mean: 105600
2016 Jun 14
4
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume
> > >> Sanjoy’s argument is faulty, if it were true we would also find our >> handling of “assert” to be unacceptable >> >> but this is not the case, no one is arguing that we need to re-design >> “assert” >> > Sure, but no one should make this argument anyway: assert is not for > optimization. In fact, we don't really want it to be used for