search for: 105537

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "105537".

Did you mean: 1055,7
2017 Feb 18
2
[RFC] Using Intel MPX to harden SafeStack
...1003041|1003233|1131769| +--------------+---------+---------+---------+-------+ |401.bzip2|79393|175297|175489|235577 | +--------------+---------+---------+---------+-------+ |403.gcc|2420209|2545041|2545233|2727913| +--------------+---------+---------+---------+-------+ |429.mcf|10977|105345|105537|155705 | +--------------+---------+---------+---------+-------+ |445.gobmk|633953|743585|743777|823993 | +--------------+---------+---------+---------+-------+ |456.hmmer|258593|358033|358225|432249 | +--------------+---------+---------+---------+-------+ |458.sjeng|96593|192929|193121|251545...
2004 Feb 06
2
how do i get rid of wine-kthread <defunct> ?
Hi, after a while of playing around with winedbg i have a lot of these: bash-2.05b# ps -A 559 pts/0 00:00:01 wine-kthread <defunct> 558 pts/0 00:00:04 wine-kthread <defunct> 607 pts/0 00:00:01 wine-kthread <defunct> 606 pts/0 00:00:04 wine-kthread <defunct> i tried differend variations on kill, and killall, but they don't go away. Any ideas? Regards,
2017 Feb 08
4
[RFC] Using Intel MPX to harden SafeStack
Hi, I previously posted about using 32-bit X86 segmentation to harden SafeStack: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-May/100346.html That involves lowering the limits of the DS and ES segments that are used for ordinary data accesses while leaving the limit for SS, the stack segment, set to its maximum value. The safe stacks were clustered above the limits of DS and ES. Thus, by