Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "1050096".
Did you mean:
1050086
2015 Oct 08
2
SRET consistency between declaration and call site
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 04:35:10PM -0700, Tim Northover wrote:
> > That seems to make it a pretty good case for consider sret mandatory in
> > general.
>
> (Still) no more than any other type cast IMO. If you know what you're
> doing you can cast function pointers (at the LLVM level), otherwise
> you're going to get into trouble.
I think we are talking about two
2008 Feb 06
1
Rsync Hang with multiple files
...o.0", O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, "\177ELF\2\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0>\0\1\0\0\0 \33p&7\0"..., 832) = 832
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=34144, ...}) = 0
mmap(0x3726700000, 1078768, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0) = 0x3726700000
mprotect(0x3726707000, 1050096, PROT_NONE) = 0
mmap(0x3726807000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0x7000) = 0x3726807000
close(3) = 0
open("/lib64/tls/libc.so.6", O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, "\177ELF\2\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0>\0\1\0\0\0\240\304&quo...