Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1048716".
Did you mean:
1048216
2015 Aug 12
3
[LLVMdev] RFC: ThinLTO File Format
Alex already made what I consider to be the most relevant point. I
would suggest removing the unwanted functionality and asking again.
From my perspective, native wrapped bitcode is only interesting (and
thus worth reviewing and/or talking about) once the native bitcode
version is in tree and functional. Frankly, I consider the native
wrapped bitcode to be an entirely orthogonal proposal