search for: 1045,29

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "1045,29".

Did you mean: 1045,20
2020 Aug 10
2
[PATCH nbdkit] python: Allow extents to return any iterable (which includes lists).
...python.c @@ -1035,7 +1035,8 @@ py_extents (void *handle, uint32_t count, uint64_t offset, struct handle *h = handle; PyObject *fn; PyObject *r; - Py_ssize_t i, size; + PyObject *iter, *t; + size_t size; if (callback_defined ("extents", &fn)) { PyErr_Clear (); @@ -1045,29 +1046,25 @@ py_extents (void *handle, uint32_t count, uint64_t offset, if (check_python_failure ("extents") == -1) return -1; - /* We expect a list of extents to be returned. Each extent is a - * tuple (offset, length, type). The list must not be empty. - */...
2008 May 31
9
[PATCH 0 of 4] mm+paravirt+xen: add pte read-modify-write abstraction (take 2)
Hi all, [ Change since last post: change name to ptep_modify_prot_, on the grounds that it isn't really a general pte-modification interface. ] This little series adds a new transaction-like abstraction for doing RMW updates to a pte, hooks it into paravirt_ops, and then makes use of it in Xen. The basic problem is that mprotect is very slow under Xen (up to 50x slower than native),
2008 May 31
9
[PATCH 0 of 4] mm+paravirt+xen: add pte read-modify-write abstraction (take 2)
Hi all, [ Change since last post: change name to ptep_modify_prot_, on the grounds that it isn't really a general pte-modification interface. ] This little series adds a new transaction-like abstraction for doing RMW updates to a pte, hooks it into paravirt_ops, and then makes use of it in Xen. The basic problem is that mprotect is very slow under Xen (up to 50x slower than native),
2008 May 31
9
[PATCH 0 of 4] mm+paravirt+xen: add pte read-modify-write abstraction (take 2)
Hi all, [ Change since last post: change name to ptep_modify_prot_, on the grounds that it isn't really a general pte-modification interface. ] This little series adds a new transaction-like abstraction for doing RMW updates to a pte, hooks it into paravirt_ops, and then makes use of it in Xen. The basic problem is that mprotect is very slow under Xen (up to 50x slower than native),