Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1041029".
Did you mean:
1040129
2014 Oct 01
2
[LLVMdev] size_t?
I believe that we provide a definition of size_t inside the compiler itself
when clang is in MSVC compatibility mode.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Eric Mader <emader at gmx.us> wrote:
> I did some more investigation of the size_t size error. I misunderstood
> what was happening. It turns out that size_t is already defined before my
> prefix header is included. I added the