Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "1034,11".
Did you mean:
103,11
2013 Mar 15
0
[PATCH] Btrfs-progs: add skinny metadata support to progs V3
...ETADATA | \
BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENDED_IREF | \
BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RAID56 | \
- BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MIXED_GROUPS)
+ BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MIXED_GROUPS | \
+ BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SKINNY_METADATA)
/*
* A leaf is full of items. offset and size tell us where to find
@@ -1034,6 +1036,12 @@ struct btrfs_root {
*/
#define BTRFS_EXTENT_ITEM_KEY 168
+/*
+ * The same as the BTRFS_EXTENT_ITEM_KEY, except it''s metadata we already know
+ * the length, so we save the level in key->offset instead of the length.
+ */
+#define BTRFS_METADATA_ITEM_KEY 169
+
#define...
2018 Dec 14
0
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
...ocked(mgr->mst_primary, port);
+ if (mgr->mst_primary) {
+ rport = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated_locked(
+ mgr->mst_primary, port);
+
+ if (rport && !drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port(rport))
+ rport = NULL;
+ }
mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
return rport;
}
@@ -1034,11 +1262,12 @@ static struct drm_dp_mst_port *drm_dp_get_validated_port_ref(struct drm_dp_mst_t
static struct drm_dp_mst_port *drm_dp_get_port(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, u8 port_num)
{
struct drm_dp_mst_port *port;
+ int ret;
list_for_each_entry(port, &mstb->ports, next) {
if...
2018 Dec 14
2
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
...t_primary) {
> + rport = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated_locked(
> + mgr->mst_primary, port);
> +
> + if (rport && !drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port(rport))
> + rport = NULL;
> + }
> mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
> return rport;
> }
> @@ -1034,11 +1262,12 @@ static struct drm_dp_mst_port *drm_dp_get_validated_port_ref(struct drm_dp_mst_t
> static struct drm_dp_mst_port *drm_dp_get_port(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, u8 port_num)
> {
> struct drm_dp_mst_port *port;
> + int ret;
>
> list_for_each_entry(port, &...
2018 Dec 19
1
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
...+ mgr->mst_primary, port);
> > > +
> > > + if (rport && !drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port(rport))
> > > + rport = NULL;
> > > + }
> > > mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
> > > return rport;
> > > }
> > > @@ -1034,11 +1262,12 @@ static struct drm_dp_mst_port
> > > *drm_dp_get_validated_port_ref(struct drm_dp_mst_t
> > > static struct drm_dp_mst_port *drm_dp_get_port(struct drm_dp_mst_branch
> > > *mstb, u8 port_num)
> > > {
> > > struct drm_dp_mst_port *port;...
2018 Dec 18
0
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
...ogy_get_port_validated_locked(
> > + mgr->mst_primary, port);
> > +
> > + if (rport && !drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port(rport))
> > + rport = NULL;
> > + }
> > mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
> > return rport;
> > }
> > @@ -1034,11 +1262,12 @@ static struct drm_dp_mst_port
> > *drm_dp_get_validated_port_ref(struct drm_dp_mst_t
> > static struct drm_dp_mst_port *drm_dp_get_port(struct drm_dp_mst_branch
> > *mstb, u8 port_num)
> > {
> > struct drm_dp_mst_port *port;
> > + int ret;
>...
2012 Oct 08
3
[PATCH v3 0/3] Add support for disk labels and hotplugging.
This is, I guess, version 3 of this patch series which adds disk
labels and hotplugging (only hot-add implemented so far).
The good news is .. it works!
Rich.
2018 Dec 14
22
[WIP PATCH 00/15] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup
This is a WIP version of the series I've been working on for a while now
to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST
helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns
out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port
and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense,
since the current upstream