Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1033861".
Did you mean:
1033801
2013 Nov 01
2
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer: this loop is not worth vectorizing
I am trying a setup where the one loop is rewritten as two loops. This
avoids the 'rem' and 'div' instructions in the index calculation (which
give the loop vectorizer a hard time).
However, with this setup the loop vectorizer complains about a too small
loop.
LV: Checking a loop in "main"
LV: Found a loop: L3
LV: Found a loop with a very small trip count. This loop