search for: 1032171

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1032171".

Did you mean: 103217
2013 Aug 08
5
[LLVMdev] Address space extension
On 08/08/2013 02:16 PM, Justin Holewinski wrote: > Why should SelectionDAGBuilder generate an explicit bitcast for a no-op > bitcast? The bitcast operation isn't just the reinterpretation (change in the semantic) of the bits without any change in the value of the bits itself? If the size and value do not change should be fine. > By definition, no bits are changed; so if the EVTs