Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "102667".
Did you mean:
1026,7
2016 Oct 13
2
GitHub Survey?
...//lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-July/103059.html> )
Then, we couldn’t converge on the monorepo, and this “third” proposal was a compromise to address the concerns of some folks.
But guess who started the discussion about this variant? http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-July/102667.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-July/102667.html>
> On Oct 13, 2016, at 3:16 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 13 October 2016 at 23:03, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote:
>> I don’t see how it is relevant,...
2016 Oct 13
2
GitHub Survey?
> On Oct 13, 2016, at 2:54 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 13 October 2016 at 22:25, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote:
>> I’m not sure what you’re referring to here. In case I wasn’t clear before,
>> I’m not interested in any way “to do a third” proposal.
>
> Ok, so we only mention two.
No we mention what’s in the