search for: 102657

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "102657".

Did you mean: 1026,7
2018 Nov 01
2
RFC: Dealing with out of tree changes and the LLVM git monorepo
I just want to point out that the issue of incompatible history is not new. This has been getting discussed all the way back in July 2016. http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-July/102657.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-July/102657.html> As James said in that email: > That we'll be getting incompatible history has been glossed over, and it is > indeed really important to make it clear and have a good plan there. This > doesn't only affect...
2018 Nov 01
2
RFC: Dealing with out of tree changes and the LLVM git monorepo
Hi, Thanks for starting this discussion Justin! On 10/31/18 5:22 PM, Justin Bogner via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi all, > > I've spent some time in the last couple of days trying to figure out how > to adopt the [LLVM git monorepo prototype] for an out of tree backend. > TLDR: I'm not convinced that this prototype is the right approach to > converting to the monorepo, and I