Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "102657".
Did you mean:
1026,7
2018 Nov 01
2
RFC: Dealing with out of tree changes and the LLVM git monorepo
I just want to point out that the issue of incompatible history is not new. This has been getting discussed all the way back in July 2016.
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-July/102657.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-July/102657.html>
As James said in that email:
> That we'll be getting incompatible history has been glossed over, and it is
> indeed really important to make it clear and have a good plan there. This
> doesn't only affect...
2018 Nov 01
2
RFC: Dealing with out of tree changes and the LLVM git monorepo
Hi,
Thanks for starting this discussion Justin!
On 10/31/18 5:22 PM, Justin Bogner via llvm-dev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've spent some time in the last couple of days trying to figure out how
> to adopt the [LLVM git monorepo prototype] for an out of tree backend.
> TLDR: I'm not convinced that this prototype is the right approach to
> converting to the monorepo, and I