Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "102636".
Did you mean:
10263
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...0 0.01 12451
prestrict.ll 1 16735 0 0.01 16702 0 0.01 16702
primes.ll 9 14036 0 0.01 14005 0 0.01 14005
printargs.ll 1 2837 0 0.01 2828 0 0.01 2828
printgph.ll 1 12861 0 0.01 12828 0 0.01 12828
print.ll 4 23223 0 0.01 23193 0 0.01 23193
printnets.ll 1 17393 0 0.01 17360 0 0.01 17360
procesnet.ll 3 102636 0 0.02 102603 0 0.02 102603
procquery.ll 2 37292 0 0.01 37258 0 0.01 37258
ProgressMt.ll 9 27557 0 0.01 27525 0 0.01 27525
ProgressUtils.ll 10 28959 0 0.01 28927 0 0.01 28927
project.ll 3 13384 0 0.01 13355 0 0.01 13355
proofcheck.ll 122 207733 8 0.02 206375 0 0.03 207716
PropIDUtils.ll 2 65132 0 0...