search for: 102612

...ile the split model induces “minor inconveniences” in the > day-to-day developer interaction. I.e. I prefer using a script to checkout > and setup the repo, and then be able to use the standard git commands for > interacting with it.” > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-July/102612.html > - Chris Bienemann: What about a contributor only wanting to contribute to > compiler-rt? He has to pay the price of cloning the full repo. > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-July/103052.html > > > On linear history and sequential revision number: > > - [m...

...ommit, git push), while the split model induces “minor inconveniences” in the day-to-day developer interaction. I.e. I prefer using a script to checkout and setup the repo, and then be able to use the standard git commands for interacting with it.” http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-July/102612.html - Chris Bienemann: What about a contributor only wanting to contribute to compiler-rt? He has to pay the price of cloning the full repo. http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-July/103052.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-July/103052.html> On linear history and...

Hi Justin, Firstly I really appreciate you taking the mantle and pushing this forward! Like Justin B I'll be bowing out after this. I thought it important because I don't believe you'll build consensus in this thread. I think the best that can be hoped for is opposition to give up fighting; advantages are to be had on both sides by different types of user and we've seen that many

Maybe we can hit the pause button on this issue of a survey vs consensus-building. I think it's a distraction from the main issue here, and it makes it harder for everyone else to participate in the thread. That said, I really do think that perspectives like Justin B's below are important. That is, if people have a problem with the monorepo, it is useful they can join the thread and say