search for: 102609

...epos with a script > that cd's to each one and runs whatever git command.” And " if all of the > repos are combined into one, you have to do work when you only want some of > them. In my experience, this is basically always”. > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-July/102609.html > - Mehdi: "the minor inconvenience in the case of the monolithic > repository is happening during the initial setup/clone/checkout, and not > during day-to-day development (git pull, git checkout -b, git commit, git > push), while the split model induces “minor inconveniences...

...manage the set of repos with a script that cd's to each one and runs whatever git command.” And " if all of the repos are combined into one, you have to do work when you only want some of them. In my experience, this is basically always”. http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-July/102609.html - Mehdi: "the minor inconvenience in the case of the monolithic repository is happening during the initial setup/clone/checkout, and not during day-to-day development (git pull, git checkout -b, git commit, git push), while the split model induces “minor inconveniences” in the day-to-day...

Hi Justin, Firstly I really appreciate you taking the mantle and pushing this forward! Like Justin B I'll be bowing out after this. I thought it important because I don't believe you'll build consensus in this thread. I think the best that can be hoped for is opposition to give up fighting; advantages are to be had on both sides by different types of user and we've seen that many

Maybe we can hit the pause button on this issue of a survey vs consensus-building. I think it's a distraction from the main issue here, and it makes it harder for everyone else to participate in the thread. That said, I really do think that perspectives like Justin B's below are important. That is, if people have a problem with the monorepo, it is useful they can join the thread and say