Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1025586".
Did you mean:
1025386
2012 Oct 12
3
[LLVMdev] [Proposal] Annotated assembly output
On Oct 12, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote:
> Hi Jim, thanks for the response. That pretty much clears up my primary
> concern. +1 for keeping the C API small/stable/robust :)
>
> Having multiple hand-implemented parsers accepting the output, I think
> it would be wise to have an official "conformance suite" for the
> syntax so that