search for: 1025335

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1025335".

Did you mean: 1025135
2012 Oct 02
2
[LLVMdev] How best to represent assume statements in LLVM IR?
On 10/02/2012 12:52 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Philip, > >> Does anyone have any suggestions on how to best represent an assumption >> statement(*) in IR? > > good question! There have been various attempts, for example Nick tried > teaching the optimizers to not prune the branch to unreachable in > > br %cond, label %assumption_holds, %assumption_doesnt_hold