search for: 1022358

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1022358".

2012 May 09
3
[LLVMdev] Discussion of eliminating the void type
>>>> there's a difference between users of LLVM (which you discuss here) >>>> and developers of LLVM (people writing transforms etc). I agree >>>> that for users it just changes one oddity for another. However for >>>> developers it should make things simpler by making the IR more uniform. >>> >>> As a developer, it would be