search for: 1022,7

rsync-2.6.6 manpage says: --delete [...] This option has no effect unless directory recursion is enabled. True. In fact, I noted that --delete doesn't delete anything if --dirs is used rather than --recursive. Is there any reason for --delete not to delete when used with --dirs? Is there a way to get rsync to actually delete files on the receiving end when using

...ref, n_ref; bool upper = false; *M1 = 1; @@ -1010,7 +1010,6 @@ gk104_pll_calc_hiclk(int target_khz, int crystal, /* we found a better combination */ if (cur_err < best_err) { best_err = cur_err; - best_clk = cur_clk; *N2 = cur_N; *N1 = n_ref; *P1 = p_ref; @@ -1022,7 +1021,6 @@ gk104_pll_calc_hiclk(int target_khz, int crystal, - target_khz; if (cur_err < best_err) { best_err = cur_err; - best_clk = cur_clk; *N2 = cur_N; *N1 = n_ref; *P1 = p_ref; -- 2.10.1

...TE 0x4 Uh. How do you know page->mapping would otherwise have bit 2 clear? Who's guaranteeing that? This is an awfully big patch to the memory management code, buried in the middle of a gigantic series which almost guarantees nobody would look at it. I call shenanigans. > @@ -1021,7 +1022,7 @@ void page_move_anon_rmap(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma) > * __page_set_anon_rmap - set up new anonymous rmap > * @page: Page or Hugepage to add to rmap > * @vma: VM area to add page to. > - * @address: User virtual address of the mapping > + * @address: Us...

...2 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c +++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c @@ -208,7 +208,6 @@ static void virtio_fs_free_devs(struct virtio_fs *fs) if (!fsvq->fud) continue; - /* TODO need to quiesce/end_requests/decrement dev_count */ fuse_dev_free(fsvq->fud); fsvq->fud = NULL; } @@ -1022,7 +1021,6 @@ static int virtio_fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb) if (i == VQ_REQUEST) continue; /* already initialized */ fuse_dev_install(fsvq->fud, fc); - atomic_inc(&fc->dev_count); } /* Previous unmount will stop all queues. Start these again */ -- 2.20.1

...> > This is an awfully big patch to the memory management code, buried > > > > > in the middle of a gigantic series which almost guarantees nobody > > > > > would look at it. I call shenanigans. > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -1021,7 +1022,7 @@ void page_move_anon_rmap(struct page > > *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma) > > > > > > * __page_set_anon_rmap - set up new anonymous rmap > > > > > > * @page: Page or Hugepage to add to rmap > > > > > > * @vma: VM area to add p...

The following patch is a backport of patch that recovers orphans from offline slots. It is being backported from mainline to 1.4 mainline patch: 0001-Patch-to-recover-orphans-in-offline-slots-during-rec.patch Thanks, --Srini

Hi: This series implement batch updating of used ring for TX. This help to reduce the cache contention on used ring. The idea is first split datacopy path from zerocopy, and do only batching for datacopy. This is because zercopy had already supported its own batching. TX PPS was increased 25.8% and Netperf TCP does not show obvious differences. The split of datapath will also be helpful for

Hi: This series implement batch updating of used ring for TX. This help to reduce the cache contention on used ring. The idea is first split datacopy path from zerocopy, and do only batching for datacopy. This is because zercopy had already supported its own batching. TX PPS was increased 25.8% and Netperf TCP does not show obvious differences. The split of datapath will also be helpful for

...uestfs-internal.h\" #include \"guestfs_protocol.h\" @@ -905,6 +936,7 @@ and generate_client_structs_compare () = #include <errno.h> #include \"guestfs.h\" +#include \"guestfs-private.h\" #include \"guestfs-internal.h\" "; @@ -990,6 +1022,7 @@ and generate_client_structs_copy () = #include <errno.h> #include \"guestfs.h\" +#include \"guestfs-private.h\" #include \"guestfs-internal.h\" "; @@ -1173,6 +1206,7 @@ and generate_client_structs_cleanup () = #include <stdlib.h> #incl...

Move the generate_all_structs and generate_all_headers functions, previously internal within the implementation of generate_guestfs_h, to be usable by other functions in the same "C" module (but not public). Only code motion. --- generator/c.ml | 163 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------- 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-) diff --git a/generator/c.ml

...0; @@ -950,6 +1012,7 @@ int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev, ret = -EFAULT; break; } + vhost_vq_meta_reset(dev); if (vhost_new_umem_range(dev->iotlb, msg->iova, msg->size, msg->iova + msg->size - 1, msg->uaddr, msg->perm)) { @@ -959,6 +1022,7 @@ int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev, vhost_iotlb_notify_vq(dev, msg); break; case VHOST_IOTLB_INVALIDATE: + vhost_vq_meta_reset(dev); vhost_del_umem_range(dev->iotlb, msg->iova, msg->iova + msg->size - 1); break; @@ -1102,12 +1166,26 @@ static...

...0; @@ -950,6 +1012,7 @@ int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev, ret = -EFAULT; break; } + vhost_vq_meta_reset(dev); if (vhost_new_umem_range(dev->iotlb, msg->iova, msg->size, msg->iova + msg->size - 1, msg->uaddr, msg->perm)) { @@ -959,6 +1022,7 @@ int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev, vhost_iotlb_notify_vq(dev, msg); break; case VHOST_IOTLB_INVALIDATE: + vhost_vq_meta_reset(dev); vhost_del_umem_range(dev->iotlb, msg->iova, msg->iova + msg->size - 1); break; @@ -1102,12 +1166,26 @@ static...

...-859,8 +970,8 @@ static long vhost_net_set_backend(struct vhost_net *n, unsigned index, int fd) if (r) goto err_used; - oldubufs = vq->ubufs; - vq->ubufs = ubufs; + oldubufs = nvq->ubufs; + nvq->ubufs = ubufs; n->tx_packets = 0; n->tx_zcopy_err = 0; @@ -911,6 +1022,7 @@ static long vhost_net_reset_owner(struct vhost_net *n) vhost_net_stop(n, &tx_sock, &rx_sock); vhost_net_flush(n); err = vhost_dev_reset_owner(&n->dev); + vhost_net_reset_ubuf_info(n); done: mutex_unlock(&n->dev.mutex); if (tx_sock) @@ -986,11 +1098,17 @@ static...

...-859,8 +970,8 @@ static long vhost_net_set_backend(struct vhost_net *n, unsigned index, int fd) if (r) goto err_used; - oldubufs = vq->ubufs; - vq->ubufs = ubufs; + oldubufs = nvq->ubufs; + nvq->ubufs = ubufs; n->tx_packets = 0; n->tx_zcopy_err = 0; @@ -911,6 +1022,7 @@ static long vhost_net_reset_owner(struct vhost_net *n) vhost_net_stop(n, &tx_sock, &rx_sock); vhost_net_flush(n); err = vhost_dev_reset_owner(&n->dev); + vhost_net_reset_ubuf_info(n); done: mutex_unlock(&n->dev.mutex); if (tx_sock) @@ -986,11 +1098,17 @@ static...

...0; @@ -950,6 +1012,7 @@ int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev, ret = -EFAULT; break; } + vhost_vq_meta_reset(dev); if (vhost_new_umem_range(dev->iotlb, msg->iova, msg->size, msg->iova + msg->size - 1, msg->uaddr, msg->perm)) { @@ -959,6 +1022,7 @@ int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev, vhost_iotlb_notify_vq(dev, msg); break; case VHOST_IOTLB_INVALIDATE: + vhost_vq_meta_reset(dev); vhost_del_umem_range(dev->iotlb, msg->iova, msg->iova + msg->size - 1); break; @@ -1102,12 +1166,26 @@ static...

...0; @@ -950,6 +1012,7 @@ int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev, ret = -EFAULT; break; } + vhost_vq_meta_reset(dev); if (vhost_new_umem_range(dev->iotlb, msg->iova, msg->size, msg->iova + msg->size - 1, msg->uaddr, msg->perm)) { @@ -959,6 +1022,7 @@ int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev, vhost_iotlb_notify_vq(dev, msg); break; case VHOST_IOTLB_INVALIDATE: + vhost_vq_meta_reset(dev); vhost_del_umem_range(dev->iotlb, msg->iova, msg->iova + msg->size - 1); break; @@ -1102,12 +1166,26 @@ static...

This is a resend of the patches yet to be applied. This patch-set addresses some of the bus/driver model cleanup that Greg sugested over the last couple of days. In this patch-set we deal with the following issues: 1) Cleanup error handling in the vmbus_probe() and vmbus_child_device_register() functions. Fixed a bug in the probe failure path as part of this cleanup. 2) The Windows

This is a resend of the patches yet to be applied. This patch-set addresses some of the bus/driver model cleanup that Greg sugested over the last couple of days. In this patch-set we deal with the following issues: 1) Cleanup error handling in the vmbus_probe() and vmbus_child_device_register() functions. Fixed a bug in the probe failure path as part of this cleanup. 2) The Windows

...enced(struct page *page, if (!page_rmapping(page)) return 0; - if (!is_locked && (!PageAnon(page) || PageKsm(page))) { + if (!is_locked && (!PageAnon(page) || PageKsm(page) || PageRemote(page))) { we_locked = trylock_page(page); if (!we_locked) return 1; @@ -1021,7 +1022,7 @@ void page_move_anon_rmap(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma) * __page_set_anon_rmap - set up new anonymous rmap * @page: Page or Hugepage to add to rmap * @vma: VM area to add page to. - * @address: User virtual address of the mapping + * @address: User virtual address of the...

I upgraded my 7.0 system to 7.1-RELEASE with freebsd-update only to find that it no longer boots correctly, instead crashing with a BTX backtrace. If I break to the loader prompt and use 'ls /boot', I also get a backtrace. A new install of 7.1 on this hardware using a separate SCSI card and drive array also leads to a BTX backtrace. I have copied this below as the first (most