search for: 102,13

...;sock->ops->send (h, h->sock, h->wbuf, h->wlen, 0); + goto next_state; + r = h->sock->ops->send (h, h->sock, h->wbuf, h->wlen, h->wflags); if (r == -1) { if (errno == EAGAIN || errno == EWOULDBLOCK) return 1; /* more data */ @@ -102,9 +102,13 @@ send_from_wbuf (struct nbd_handle *h) h->wbuf += r; h->wlen -= r; if (h->wlen == 0) - return 0; /* move to next state */ + goto next_state; else return 1; /* more data */ + + next_state: + h->wflags = 0;...

...truct nouveau_grobj *rect = pNv->NvRectangle; struct nouveau_bo *bo = nouveau_pixmap_bo(pPixmap); unsigned delta = nouveau_pixmap_offset(pPixmap); - unsigned int fmt, pitch, color; + unsigned int fmt, pitch, fmt2 = NV04_GDI_RECTANGLE_TEXT_COLOR_FORMAT_A8R8G8B8; WAIT_RING(chan, 64); @@ -102,13 +102,12 @@ NV04EXAPrepareSolid(PixmapPtr pPixmap, int alu, Pixel planemask, Pixel fg) pitch = exaGetPixmapPitch(pPixmap); if (pPixmap->drawable.bitsPerPixel == 16) { - /* convert to 32bpp */ - uint32_t r = (fg&0x1F) * 255 / 31; - uint32_t g = ((fg&0x7E0) >> 5)...

...hrase.c Thu Oct 18 13:59:25 2001 @@ -36,12 +36,6 @@ #include <termios.h> #include <readpassphrase.h> -#ifdef TCSASOFT -# define _T_FLUSH (TCSAFLUSH|TCSASOFT) -#else -# define _T_FLUSH (TCSAFLUSH) -#endif - char * readpassphrase(prompt, buf, bufsiz, flags) const char *prompt; @@ -102,13 +96,13 @@ term.c_cc[VSTATUS] = _POSIX_VDISABLE; } #endif - (void)tcsetattr(input, _T_FLUSH, &term); + (void)tcsetattr(input, TCSANOW, &term); } if (!(flags & RPP_ECHO_ON)) { if (tcgetattr(input, &term) == 0 && (term.c_lflag & ECHO)) { echo = 1;...

...le_types.h> #include <asm/sev-es.h> #include <asm/trapnr.h> #include <asm/trap_pf.h> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h index e919f09ae33c..cf1d957c7091 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h @@ -102,11 +102,13 @@ static __always_inline void sev_es_nmi_complete(void) if (static_branch_unlikely(&sev_es_enable_key)) __sev_es_nmi_complete(); } +extern int __init sev_es_efi_map_ghcbs(pgd_t *pgd); #else static inline void sev_es_ist_enter(struct pt_regs *regs) { } static inline void sev...

...creating cpuaffinity" + " file, continuing...\n"); } } diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pci_hotplug_core.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pci_hotplug_core.c index 5f85b1b..96f99c7 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pci_hotplug_core.c +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pci_hotplug_core.c @@ -102,13 +102,13 @@ static int get_##name (struct hotplug_slot *slot, type *value) \ { \ struct hotplug_slot_ops *ops = slot->ops; \ int retval = 0; \ - if (try_module_get(ops->owner)) { \ - if (ops->get_##name) \ - retval = ops->get_##name(slot, value); \ -...

...creating cpuaffinity" + " file, continuing...\n"); } } diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pci_hotplug_core.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pci_hotplug_core.c index 5f85b1b..96f99c7 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pci_hotplug_core.c +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pci_hotplug_core.c @@ -102,13 +102,13 @@ static int get_##name (struct hotplug_slot *slot, type *value) \ { \ struct hotplug_slot_ops *ops = slot->ops; \ int retval = 0; \ - if (try_module_get(ops->owner)) { \ - if (ops->get_##name) \ - retval = ops->get_##name(slot, value); \ -...

...creating cpuaffinity" + " file, continuing...\n"); } } diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pci_hotplug_core.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pci_hotplug_core.c index 5f85b1b..96f99c7 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pci_hotplug_core.c +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pci_hotplug_core.c @@ -102,13 +102,13 @@ static int get_##name (struct hotplug_slot *slot, type *value) \ { \ struct hotplug_slot_ops *ops = slot->ops; \ int retval = 0; \ - if (try_module_get(ops->owner)) { \ - if (ops->get_##name) \ - retval = ops->get_##name(slot, value); \ -...

Appears to have a measurable benefit, see 3/3 for test results. Rich.

...gt;>> #include <asm/trap_pf.h> >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h >>> index e919f09ae33c..cf1d957c7091 100644 >>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h >>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h >>> @@ -102,11 +102,13 @@ static __always_inline void sev_es_nmi_complete(void) >>> if (static_branch_unlikely(&sev_es_enable_key)) >>> __sev_es_nmi_complete(); >>> } >>> +extern int __init sev_es_efi_map_ghcbs(pgd_t *pgd); >>> #else >&g...

...allback debug_callback; + /* How strict to be. */ + uint32_t strict; + /* State machine. * * The actual current state is ‘state’. ‘public_state’ is updated diff --git a/generator/API.ml b/generator/API.ml index b212e95..aa970e6 100644 --- a/generator/API.ml +++ b/generator/API.ml @@ -102,6 +102,13 @@ and link = | ExternalLink of string * int | URLLink of string +let strict_call_description = "\n +By default, libnbd will reject attempts to use this function with +parameters that are likely to result in server failure, such as +requesting an unknown command flag. The L<nb...

Hi all, this series builds on my previous changes in Jens' for-4.11/rq-refactor branch that split out the BLOCK_PC fields from struct request into a new struct scsi_request, and makes support for struct scsi_request and the SCSI passthrough ioctls optional. It is now only enabled by drivers that need it. In addition I've made SCSI passthrough support in the virtio_blk driver an optional

Hi all, this series builds on my previous changes in Jens' for-4.11/rq-refactor branch that split out the BLOCK_PC fields from struct request into a new struct scsi_request, and makes support for struct scsi_request and the SCSI passthrough ioctls optional. It is now only enabled by drivers that need it. In addition I've made SCSI passthrough support in the virtio_blk driver an optional

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is a new version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches for x86. The previous versions can be found as a linked list starting here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200824085511.7553-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ I updated the patch-set based on ther review comments I got and the discussions around it. Another important change is that the early IDT

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is a new version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches for x86. The previous versions can be found as a linked list starting here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200824085511.7553-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ I updated the patch-set based on ther review comments I got and the discussions around it. Another important change is that the early IDT

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Please review and comments. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Please review and comments. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation

This patch series moves some files and directories around but is only code motion (or supposed to be). A new directory, common/, is created for all of the common code which is currently shared in random ways between parts of the project. And src/ becomes lib/ (the largest change, but mostly mechanical). In full this series makes the following changes: src/libprotocol -> common/protocol

Hi. I rewrote the patch according to the comments. I adopted generating in-place code because it looks the quickest way. The point Eddie wanted to discuss is how to generate code and its ABI. i.e. in-place generating v.s. direct jump v.s. indirect function call Indirect function call doesn't make sense because ivt.S is compiled multi times. And it is up to pv instances to choose in-place