search for: 1018028

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1018028".

Did you mean: 1018,28
2011 Sep 19
3
[LLVMdev] Suggested base version for adding a new backend?
Good morning, What is the general consensus about using LLVM 2.9 vs tip of tree for developing new backends? Is LLVM 2.9 still recent enough to make forward porting easy once 3.0 comes out? Is tip of tree considered stable enough for non-core development? My reason for asking is that a fellow grad student and I are about to start implementing a new backend for RISK-V - a research