search for: 10164

...218756 1 ztdummy crc_ccitt 2176 1 zaptel ohci_hcd 16388 0 floppy 49028 0 pcspkr 2180 0 piix 8580 0 [permanent] ehci_hcd 24456 0 uhci_hcd 26256 0 rtc 10164 1 ztdummy usbcore 84740 4 ohci_hcd,ehci_hcd,uhci_hcd However, when I enter a meetme conference, I get this: -- Playing 'conf-getconfno' (language 'en') Mar 3 15:27:26 WARNING[23657]: channel.c:2535 ast_request: No channel type registered for 'zap' Mar...

...49028 0 pcspkr 2180 0 siimage 9472 0 [permanent] piix 8580 0 [permanent] ehci_hcd 24456 0 uhci_hcd 26256 0 usbcore 84740 5 usbhid,ohci_hcd,ehci_hcd,uhci_hcd rtc 10164 1 ztdummy crc_ccitt 2176 1 zaptel and I have the app_meetme application loaded. *CLI> show modules like meetme Module Description Use Count app_meetme.so MeetMe conference bridge 0 1...

...00000317 auipc t1,0x0 1e: 000300e7 jalr t1 00000022 <.L2>: 22: 40b2 lw ra,12(sp) 24: 8522 mv a0,s0 26: 4422 lw s0,8(sp) 28: 0141 addi sp,sp,16 2a: 8082 ret And after linking: 00010164 <foo>: 10164: 1141 addi sp,sp,-16 10166: c422 sw s0,8(sp) 10168: c606 sw ra,12(sp) 1016a: 06300793 li a5,99 1016e: 842a mv s0,a0 10...

...;.L2>: >> 22: 40b2 lw ra,12(sp) >> 24: 8522 mv a0,s0 >> 26: 4422 lw s0,8(sp) >> 28: 0141 addi sp,sp,16 >> 2a: 8082 ret >> >> And after linking: >> >> 00010164 <foo>: >> 10164: 1141 addi sp,sp,-16 >> 10166: c422 sw s0,8(sp) >> 10168: c606 sw ra,12(sp) >> 1016a: 06300793 li a5,99 >> 1016e:...

Hey all, Trying to get feel for RSpec usage so I''m taking a straw poll... What''s the largest project you''ve used RSpec on in terms of app LOC app and spec LOC? Also, how long have you been using RSpec in "production" code? -Bryan

...6:40 G2659310 2006-309-13-22-02.txt 10138 FALSE 666 2006-11-05 13:17:00 2006-11-13 10:56:40 G2659310 2006-309-13-58-03.txt 10148 FALSE 666 2006-11-05 13:52:00 2006-11-13 10:56:40 G2659310 2006-309-14-34-04.txt 10150 FALSE 666 2006-11-05 14:28:00 2006-11-13 10:56:40 G2659310 2006-309-15-10-14.txt 10164 FALSE 666 2006-11-05 15:04:00 2006-11-13 10:56:40 G2659310 2006-309-15-46-15.txt 10174 FALSE 666 2006-11-05 15:40:00 2006-11-13 10:56:40 G2659310 2006-309-16-22-16.txt 10172 FALSE 666 2006-11-05 16:16:00 2006-11-13 10:56:40 G2659310 2006-309-16-58-18.txt 10172 FALSE 666 2006-11-05 16:52:00 2006...

...for details. Wine is available thanks to the work of many people. See the file AUTHORS in the distribution for the complete list. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bugs fixed in 3.0-rc3 (total 24): 9159 shell32/explorer: Add support for Progman DDE interface 10164 Pool of Radiance 1.4 intermittently shows garbage in surfaces 13548 Wine's setupapi does not know how to recursively delete registry keys 14937 Astroplanner 1.6.1 crashes when closing "preferences" window (TOOLTIPS_SubclassProc must be unsubclassed during WM_NCDESTROY) 21849...

...-05 13:17:00 > > 2006-11-13 10:56:40 > > G2659310 2006-309-13-58-03.txt 10148 FALSE 666 2006-11-05 13:52:00 > > 2006-11-13 10:56:40 > > G2659310 2006-309-14-34-04.txt 10150 FALSE 666 2006-11-05 14:28:00 > > 2006-11-13 10:56:40 > > G2659310 2006-309-15-10-14.txt 10164 FALSE 666 2006-11-05 15:04:00 > > 2006-11-13 10:56:40 > > G2659310 2006-309-15-46-15.txt 10174 FALSE 666 2006-11-05 15:40:00 > > 2006-11-13 10:56:40 > > G2659310 2006-309-16-22-16.txt 10172 FALSE 666 2006-11-05 16:16:00 > > 2006-11-13 10:56:40 > > G2659310 200...

Hi, Does lld support linker relaxation that may shrink code size? As far as I see lld seems to assume that the content of input sections to be fixed other than patching up relocations, but I believe some targets may benefit the extra optimization opportunity with relaxation. Specifically, I'm currently working on adding support for RISC-V in lld, and RISC-V heavily relies on linker relaxation

Hi all, what is the best way tod esing a form in RoR? Do you use Dreamweaver or something similar? thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...ase: /* * release the node */ this_cpu_ptr(&mcs_nodes[0])->count--; // this_cpu_dec(mcs_nodes[0].count); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(queue_spin_lock_slowpath); -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: spinlocks.tar.bz2 Type: application/octet-stream Size: 10164 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20140303/03dc8269/attachment.obj>

...ase: /* * release the node */ this_cpu_ptr(&mcs_nodes[0])->count--; // this_cpu_dec(mcs_nodes[0].count); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(queue_spin_lock_slowpath); -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: spinlocks.tar.bz2 Type: application/octet-stream Size: 10164 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20140303/03dc8269/attachment.obj>

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:42:19PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > >>+ old = xchg(&qlock->lock_wait, _QSPINLOCK_WAITING|_QSPINLOCK_LOCKED); > >>+ > >>+ if (old == 0) { > >>+ /* > >>+ * Got the lock, can clear the waiting bit now > >>+ */ > >>+ smp_u8_store_release(&qlock->wait, 0); > > > >So we just did an

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:42:19PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > >>+ old = xchg(&qlock->lock_wait, _QSPINLOCK_WAITING|_QSPINLOCK_LOCKED); > >>+ > >>+ if (old == 0) { > >>+ /* > >>+ * Got the lock, can clear the waiting bit now > >>+ */ > >>+ smp_u8_store_release(&qlock->wait, 0); > > > >So we just did an

...38 0 localhost:80 89.31.89.51:1419 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 localhost:80 77.70.106.4:14550 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 localhost:36872 208.67.70.3:80 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 1 localhost:36886 66.37.52.232:80 SYN_SENT tcp 0 10164 localhost:80 58.187.121.173:10350 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 localhost:80 85.140.195.98:4052 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 localhost:80 66.199.253.130:57278 FIN_WAIT2 tcp 0 0 localhost:37384 213.41.23.61:80 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0...

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability

...1 0 0.02 204451 ZipRegister.ll 3 5750 0 0.01 5713 0 0.01 5713 ZipStrong.ll 22 63584 0 0.01 63552 0 0.01 63552 ZipUpdate.ll 71 615978 10 0.05 609329 * * * zmath.ll 14 33739 0 0.01 33715 0 0.01 30643 zmatrix.ll 15 47367 0 0.01 47343 0 0.01 47343 zmisc.ll 9 35142 0 0.01 35118 0 0.01 35118 zpacked.ll 4 10164 0 0.01 10140 0 0.01 10140 zpaint.ll 10 43874 0 0.01 43850 0 0.00 43850 zpath2.ll 12 29303 0 0.01 29279 0 0.01 29279 zpath.ll 18 28489 0 0.01 28465 0 0.01 28465 zrelbit.ll 15 50741 0 0.01 50717 * * * zstack.ll 10 28745 0 0.01 28721 0 0.01 28721 zstring.ll 5 36071 0 0.01 36047 0 0.01 36047 ztype.ll 1...

...00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:08:00 SRC=127.0.0.1 DST=224.0.0.251 LEN=161 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=255 ID=42118 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=5353 DPT=5353 LEN=141 Feb 6 15:39:18 radio kernel: [ 295.563777] [UFW AUDIT] IN= OUT=enp2s5 SRC=192.168.254.39 DST=224.0.0.251 LEN=161 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=255 ID=10164 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=5353 DPT=5353 LEN=141 Feb 6 15:39:18 radio kernel: [ 295.563787] [UFW ALLOW] IN= OUT=enp2s5 SRC=192.168.254.39 DST=224.0.0.251 LEN=161 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=255 ID=10164 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=5353 DPT=5353 LEN=141 Feb 6 15:39:18 radio kernel: [ 295.563811] [UFW AUDIT] IN=enp2s5 OUT...