search for: 1016136

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1016136".

Did you mean: 101613
2011 Jun 03
2
[LLVMdev] Thinking about "whacky" backends
On 6/3/2011 3:19 PM, Samuel Crow wrote: > Why not runtime checks? The constant folding and dead-code elimination passes would get rid of any redundant code in a later stage of compilation anyway. The important part, as I see it, is that LLVM already does constant folding and dead-code elimination. Meta-data might require more effort in the long run. > > --snip-- Less flexible for the