search for: 10148

...split the dataframe according to those bins. chrom chromStart chromEnd name cumsum bin chr1 10089 10309 ZBTB33 10089 1 chr1 10132 10536 TAF7_(SQ-8) 20221 1 chr1 10133 10362 Pol2-4H8 30354 1 chr1 10148 10418 MafF_(M8194) 40502 1 chr1 10382 10578 ZBTB33 50884 1 chr1 16132 16352 CTCF 67016 1 -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/apply-with-multiple-conditions-tp4635098.html Sent from...

...not allowed exc->retval = 0.0; icc -std=c99 -std=gnu11 -I../../src/extra -I../../src/extra/xdr -I. -I../../src/include -I../../src/include -I/usr/local/include -I../../src/nmath -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -fopenmp -fpic -g -O3 -wd188 -ip -mp -c flexiblas.c -o flexiblas.o icc: command line remark #10148: option '-mp' not supported compilation aborted for arithmetic.c (code 2) make[3]: *** [../../Makeconf:129: arithmetic.o] Error 2 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... icc: command line remark #10148: option '-mp' not supported make[3]: Leaving directory '/opt/sources/R/R...

...icc -std=c99 -std=gnu11 -I../../src/extra -I../../src/extra/xdr -I. >> -I../../src/include -I../../src/include? -I/usr/local/include >> -I../../src/nmath -DHAVE_CONFIG_H?? -fopenmp -fpic? -g -O3 -wd188 -ip >> -mp? -c flexiblas.c -o flexiblas.o >> icc: command line remark #10148: option '-mp' not supported >> compilation aborted for arithmetic.c (code 2) >> make[3]: *** [../../Makeconf:129: arithmetic.o] Error 2 >> make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >> icc: command line remark #10148: option '-mp' not supported >> mak...

...6:39 G2659310 2006-308-02-06-00.txt 10188 FALSE 666 2006-11-04 02:00:00 2006-11-13 10:56:39 G2659310 2006-308-02-41-57.txt 10168 FALSE 666 2006-11-04 02:36:00 2006-11-13 10:56:39 G2659310 2006-308-03-17-54.txt 10158 FALSE 666 2006-11-04 03:12:00 2006-11-13 10:56:39 G2659310 2006-308-03-53-51.txt 10148 FALSE 666 2006-11-04 03:48:00 2006-11-13 10:56:39 G2659310 2006-308-04-29-48.txt 10144 FALSE 666 2006-11-04 04:24:00 2006-11-13 10:56:39 G2659310 2006-308-05-05-44.txt 10132 FALSE 666 2006-11-04 05:00:00 2006-11-13 10:56:39 G2659310 2006-308-05-41-41.txt 10136 FALSE 666 2006-11-04 05:35:00 2006...

...10:49:00 2006-11-13 10:56:41", > "G2659310 2006-310-11-31-43.txt 10136 FALSE 666 2006-11-06 11:25:00 > 2006-11-13 10:56:41", > "G2659310 2006-310-12-08-04.txt 10140 FALSE 666 2006-11-06 12:02:00 > 2006-11-13 10:56:41", > "G2659310 2006-310-12-43-17.txt 10148 FALSE 666 2006-11-06 12:38:00 > 2006-11-13 10:56:41", > "G2659310 2006-310-13-20-21.txt 10138 FALSE 666 2006-11-06 13:15:00 > 2006-11-13 10:56:41", > "G2659310 2006-310-13-56-28.txt 10080 FALSE 666 2006-11-06 13:51:00 > 2006-11-13 10:56:38") > > time...

...are3/2013-09-04 --exclude .svn/ /mnt/share3/ /mnt/backups/share3/2013-09-05 The exit code is 137, which I believe is 128 (from rsync) plus 9 sent by timeout. Here are the child rsync processes, as you can see 1915 is in uninterruptable sleep, but I believe that is normal: root 1914 0.0 0.0 10148 492 ? S Sep05 0:00 timeout -k 30s 764m rsync -av --modify-window=2 --link-dest=/mnt/backups/share3/2013-09-04 --exclude .svn/ /mnt/share3/ /mnt/backups/share3/2013-09-05 root 1915 0.0 0.3 81240 27784 ? D Sep05 0:20 rsync -av --modify-window=2 --link-dest=/mnt/backu...

Anybody thought abt an adapter for this? Obviously not in the purview of ActiveRecord but could have a similar interface.. i.e. CRUD + find [xpath] - Ruby binding does exist. Just curious. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...sing imap access to our corporate mail hub) using Netscape and it seems to work fine. This seems very similar to the problem reported by mcurtis9 at csc.com.au on 2001-09-25 2:09:57. Thanks for your attention. -- Gerardo Lamastra Centro Sicurezza Be-Secure Telecom Italia LAB Via Reiss Romoli 274 - 10148 Torino Tel. 011 228-6586 Fax. 011 228-6360

Hi, I am getting the following messages for a few days. WARNING[10148]: chan_iax2.c:1219 __send_lagrq: I was supposed to send a LAGRQ with callno 15691, but no such call exists (and I cannot remove lagid, either). I got 2 iax trunks which used by test purposes only. And no iax clients or no calling rules thru this iax channnels so far.. So why do i keep getting t...

..., 7123, 9104, 12836, 7928, 12764, 8922, 5324, -1004, 1806, 10263, 5635, 10310, 5625, 8861, 14613, 3896, 10316, 5725, 12751, 6113, 2997, 112, 5707, 4987, -1018, 8055, 13885, 13073, 14585, 14865, 14935, 14390, 9735, 7654, 4557, 661, 1638, 1112, 14011, 3086, 7032, 13942, 13325, 6735, 13900, 12673, 10148, 14193, 14767, 8447, 6114, 10688, 13544, 7106, 8587, 14753, 7886, 12280, 11946, 13662, 3332, 2108, 13977, 6203, 8369, 13857, 8369, 11486, 8306, 12466, 12639, 7270, 4325, 13843, 14026, 14039, 6147, 7676, 5781, 7038, 9187, 14640, 6174, 11491, 13913, 13787, 13465, 8854, 13152, 1826, 1412, 4317, 5...

> MS <- floor (log2 (MinFileLen)) #NUMBER OF DECOMPOSITION LEVELS *** caught segfault *** address 0x31343142, cause 'memory not mapped' Possible actions: 1: abort (with core dump, if enabled) 2: normal R exit 3: exit R without saving workspace 4: exit R saving workspace Any idea ? Thank you in advance. Maura tutti i telefonini TIM! [[alternative HTML version

...[DC=example,DC=net] objects[8540/12791] linked_values[0/0] Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[8942/12791] linked_values[0/0] Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[9344/12791] linked_values[0/0] Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[9746/12791] linked_values[0/0] Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[10148/12791] linked_values[0/0] Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[10550/12791] linked_values[0/0] Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[10952/12791] linked_values[0/0] Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[11354/12791] linked_values[0/0] Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[11756/12791] linked_values[0/...

...91] linked_values[0/0] >> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[8942/12791] linked_values[0/0] >> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[9344/12791] linked_values[0/0] >> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[9746/12791] linked_values[0/0] >> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[10148/12791] linked_values[0/0] >> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[10550/12791] linked_values[0/0] >> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[10952/12791] linked_values[0/0] >> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[11354/12791] linked_values[0/0] >> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] o...

...gt;> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[8942/12791] linked_values[0/0] >>>> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[9344/12791] linked_values[0/0] >>>> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[9746/12791] linked_values[0/0] >>>> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[10148/12791] linked_values[0/0] >>>> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[10550/12791] linked_values[0/0] >>>> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[10952/12791] linked_values[0/0] >>>> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[11354/12791] linked_values[0/0] >>>&gt...

...objects[8540/12791] linked_values[0/0] > Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[8942/12791] linked_values[0/0] > Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[9344/12791] linked_values[0/0] > Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[9746/12791] linked_values[0/0] > Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[10148/12791] linked_values[0/0] > Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[10550/12791] linked_values[0/0] > Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[10952/12791] linked_values[0/0] > Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[11354/12791] linked_values[0/0] > Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[11756/127...

...0] > >> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[8942/12791] linked_values[0/0] > >> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[9344/12791] linked_values[0/0] > >> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[9746/12791] linked_values[0/0] > >> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[10148/12791] linked_values[0/0] > >> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[10550/12791] linked_values[0/0] > >> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[10952/12791] linked_values[0/0] > >> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[11354/12791] linked_values[0/0] > >> Partition[...

...on[DC=example,DC=net] objects[8942/12791] linked_values[0/0] > >>>> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[9344/12791] linked_values[0/0] > >>>> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[9746/12791] linked_values[0/0] > >>>> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[10148/12791] linked_values[0/0] > >>>> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[10550/12791] linked_values[0/0] > >>>> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[10952/12791] linked_values[0/0] > >>>> Partition[DC=example,DC=net] objects[11354/12791] linked_values[0/0]...

Hey, everyone, I''m having some issues with a Xen DomU right related to performance. We have an application that cross-compiles a Linux distribution from scratch for embedded systems. We''re attempting to run this application inside a Xen DomU (paravirtualized, modified guest kernel), and the performance is really bad. The culprit seems to be high I/O wait times related to the

...n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/em3d/em3d | 0.0557 7584 0.0449 * 0.0448 | 6.61 7.63 7.05 * 7.23 | 0.87 0.94 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/health/health | 0.0472 10148 0.0446 * 0.0439 | 0.66 0.73 0.57 * 0.62 | 0.90 1.16 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/mst/mst | 0.0494 6068 0.0348 * 0.0339 | 0.40 0.39 0.38 * 0.42...

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When