Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1012687".
Did you mean:
1012678
2010 Oct 09
4
[LLVMdev] LTO, plugins and binary sizes
For some time now I was curious on what the size impact of LTO was. I
decided to test this with a large C++ app, clang was a natural choice.
With PR8313 fixed with the proposed patch and PR8300 avoided by
disabling constructor aliasing I was able to hack clang to bootstrap
with LTO enabled using the gold plugin.
I did the testing on linux x86-64. Gcc is the 4.4.4 included with
Fedora 13. The