search for: 101

...r in trunk the issue just when i configure my trunk in our server but when i configure the trunk directly in x-lite i can contact this number without issue below the cli == Using SIP RTP TOS bits 184 == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 -- Executing [0149xxxxxx at from-internal:1] Macro("SIP/101-00000103", "user-callerid,LIMIT,EXTERNAL,") in new stack -- Executing [s at macro-user-callerid:1] Set("SIP/101-00000103", "TOUCH_MONITOR=1426869820.301") in new stack -- Executing [s at macro-user-callerid:2] Set("SIP/101-00000103", "AMPUSE...

...e phone call goes through and voice is perfect.. and at others one side can hear me yet i cant hear them.. and at others neither one of us can hear the other end.. i've checked my logs and havent found anything relevant.. but yet again maybe you could as i'm a newbie.. Registered SIP '101' at 192.168.75.192 port 22162 -- Saved useragent "X-Lite release 1014k stamp 47051" for peer 101 -- Executing [101 at spa:1] Dial("SIP/100-0967ad88", "SIP/101|15") in new stack -- Called 101 -- SIP/101-09683690 is ringing -- SIP/101-09683690 ans...

...igure my trunk in our server but when i > configure the trunk directly in x-lite i can contact this number without > issue > > below the cli > > == Using SIP RTP TOS bits 184 > == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 > -- Executing [0149xxxxxx at from-internal:1] Macro("SIP/101-00000103", > "user-callerid,LIMIT,EXTERNAL,") in new stack > -- Executing [s at macro-user-callerid:1] Set("SIP/101-00000103", > "TOUCH_MONITOR=1426869820.301") in new stack > -- Executing [s at macro-user-callerid:2] Set("SIP/101-00000103...

...0033149xxxxxx is configured i can call this number without issue the server asterisk and the ip-phone where the number is configured are in the same network 192.168.1.X Using SIP RTP TOS bits 184 == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 -- Called SIP/FD/0033149xxxxxx == Begin MixMonitor Recording SIP/101-0000010d -- SIP/FD-0000010e is making progress passing it to SIP/101-0000010d > 0x2b393cfc2610 -- Probation passed - setting RTP source address to 192. 168.1.138:55542 > 0x1d08efa0 -- Probation passed - setting RTP source address to 217.195.xx.xx:46346...

...quot;Tue", "Wed", "Wed", "Wed", "Wed", "Wed", "Wed", "Wed", "Wed", "Thu", "Thu", "Thu", "Thu", "Thu", "Thu", "Thu", "Thu"), SITE = c(101, 101, 102, 102, 103, 103, 104, 104, 101, 101, 102, 102, 103, 103, 104, 104, 101, 101, 102, 102, 103, 103, 104, 104, 101, 101, 102, 102, 103, 103, 104, 104, 101, 101, 102, 102, 103, 103, 104, 104, 101, 101, 102, 102, 103, 103, 104, 104, 101, 101, 102, 102, 103, 103, 104, 104, 101, 101, 102, 102,...

Hello I have a problem on keeping the format when I export a matrix file with the write.table() function. When I import the data volcano from rgl package it looks like this in R: > data[1:5,] [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] [,8] [,9] [,10] [,11] [,12] [,13] [,14] [1,] 100 100 101 101 101 101 101 100 100 100 101 101 102 102 [2,] 101 101 102 102 102 102 102 101 101 101 102 102 103 103 [3,] 102 102 103 103 103 103 103 102 102 102 103 103 104 104 [4,] 103 103 104 104 104 104 104 103 103 103 103 104 104 104...

...5) date: 6,7,8,10,13,14,15,16,17,18,19 36 0.014060 0.2061 * 3) TIM: 222 53 0.029490 0.2642 6) date: 6,7,11,12,14,15,18,19 28 0.010670 0.2539 12) lid: A 6 0.001350 0.2350 * 13) lid: B 22 0.006582 0.2591 * 7) date: 8,9,10,13,16,17 25 0.012620 0.2756 14) machine: 101 14 0.005750 0.2850 * 15) machine: 102 11 0.004055 0.2636 * and yet > dat$date [1] 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 10 [26] 10 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 [51] 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 15 15 15 15 15...

...83.136.33.3:64118 (type 00, seq 042775, ts 4066333768, len 000160) Got RTP packet from 83.136.33.3:64118 (type 00, seq 042777, ts 4066334088, len 000160) Got RTP packet from 83.136.33.3:64118 (type 00, seq 042778, ts 4066334248, len 000160) Got RTP packet from 83.136.33.3:64118 (type 101, seq 042780, ts 4066334648, len 000004) Got RTP RFC2833 from 83.136.33.3:64118 (type 101, seq 042780, ts 4066334648, len 000004, mark 0, event 00000001, end 0, duration 00320) Got RTP packet from 83.136.33.3:64118 (type 101, seq 042781, ts 4066334648, len 000004) Got RTP RFC2833 from 8...

...P+ remains unregistered. These are my config files: skinny.conf [general] port = 2000 ; Port to bind to, default tcp/2000 bindaddr = 172.20.1.1 ; Address to bind to dateFormat = D-M-Y ; M,D,Y in any order (5 chars max) keepAlive = 120 languaje=es allow = all ; disallow = [101] device=SEP00B06409E748 model=12SP ; Valid models: 12SP, 30VIP, 7910, 7920 (so far) version=P002L2J2 host=172.20.1.1 context=telsip line => 101 callwaiting=no callerid="Juanjo",<101>; extensions.conf exten => 3,1,DBget(temp=clid/SIP/Phone3) exten => 3,2,SetC...

...teway for the failed calls. Strange thing is that this is happening randomly, half the call I make are able to get through the SIP-Trunk. I will really appreciate any input/suggession on this. Obaid. Here are my conf files, followed by SIP debug output on asterisk. trunk 4= SIP trunk 24.XX.XXX.101 ---> Asterisk server on Public IP 209.XXX.XXX.113 ---> SIP gatway ---------------iax_additional.conf-------------- [20] username=20 type=friend secret=XXX record_out=On-Demand record_in=On-Demand qualify=no notransfer=yes mailbox=20@default host=dynamic context=from-internal callerid="...

I would like to know if I can set Call Forwarding on an extension but allow direct calls from the extension it is forwarded to. Example: Extension 100 sets call forwarding (all) to extension 101. All calls to 100 are immediately forwarded to 101 as expected. However, if 101 tries to transfer a call to 100 or tries to call 100 directly, it sounds "busy" because it obviously goes into a loop where 101 tries to call itself. How do I set an "exception" so that 101 can ac...

...2L, 2L, 2L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L), SITE1 = c(101, 102, 103, 104, 103, 104, 101, 102, 101, 102, 103, 104, 101, 102, 103, 104, 103, 104, 101, 102, 103, 104, 101, 102, 102, 103, 104, 101, 101, 102, 103, 104, 102, 103, 104, 101, 103, 104, 101, 102, 103, 104, 101, 102, 103, 104, 101, 102, 104, 101, 102, 103, 102, 103, 104, 101, 104, 10...

Hi everybody In advance sorry for my bad english and if my problem was already exposed (I didn't find any tips in the mailing list archive. Bad luck) I have some questions about asterisk 1.6 release : 1) how can I do a n+101 priority jumping if a SIP canal is busy ? I read that the general parameter "priorityjumping" is depreciated in the 1.6 release and I already try the "j" option in dial() application but no way. Here a sample of my simple dialplan : exten => 101,1,Ringing exten => 101,2,A...

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: zaptel.conf Type: application/octet-stream Size: 34 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070508/f4c36cab/zaptel.obj -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:

Currently I have a data set looking like: License Species Year HD Quota L.R.QTA L.R.QTA Success Surplus Permit Elk 1999 101 50 87 90 151 10 Permit Deer 1999 101 50 20 10 151 8 Permit Elk 1999 101 50 87 90 20 9 Permit Elk 199...

Got my first round of IP500s in today. Anybody have any example sip.cfg files they'd like to share? Tim Jackson Network Engineer Angelina County, Texas (936)639-4827 office (936)414-6723 mobile -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040928/a923e094/attachment.htm

...an unsuccessful call pickup from the Cisco<br> <br> Any light anyone can shed on the perplexing problem would be most appreciated. I have a forehead-shaped dent in the wall that is growing larger.<br> <br> <br> <b><u>Linksys SPA2102 ATA "sip show peer 101":</u></b><br> <pre> * Name : 101 Secret : <Set> MD5Secret : <Not set> Context : numberplan-custom-1 Subscr.Cont. : <Not set> Language : AMA flags : Unknown Transfer mode: open CallingPres : Presentation Allo...

Price 2010-10-11 99 2010-10-12 101 2010-10-13 102 2010-10-14 103 2010-10-15 99 2010-10-18 98 2010-10-19 97 2010-10-20 101 2010-10-21 101 2010-10-22 101 I have this dataset and I only want to return instances when the Price is > 100. If I use the code: Price > 100 then it will evaluate each entry as...

Hi All; I am facing a problem that always the users confused and connect the telephone line coming from the telephone service provider to the FXS port and cause it to be damaged, specially if the card was 2 fxs and 2 fxo, so they make mistake and connect the line to fxs while it should be connected to fxo. What is the solution for this disaster? Regards Bilal

...1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L, 5L, 5L, 5L, 5L, 5L, 5L, 5L), .Label = c("Mon", "Tue", "Wed", "Thu", "Fri"), class = "factor"), SITE = c(101, 101, 102, 102, 103, 103, 104, 104, 101, 101, 102, 102, 103, 103, 104, 104, 101, 101, 102, 102, 103, 103, 104, 104, 101, 101, 102, 102, 103, 103, 104, 104, 101, 101, 102, 102, 103, 103, 104, 104, 101, 101, 102, 102, 103, 103, 104, 104, 101, 101, 102, 102, 103, 103, 104, 104, 101...